- MA
- Plymouth County
- 9/24/25
- 09/24/2025
- 94 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School Committee convened recently, addressing several issues impacting the district. The most notable development was the approval of a new union contract for maintenance, custodians, and grounds staff, effective from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028. The contract includes a 2% annual cost increase and provisions for promotions, overtime pay, and tuition reimbursement. The committee also discussed ongoing budget concerns, staffing challenges, and recent achievements by the high school marching band.
- FL
- Marion County
- 9/23/25
- 09/23/2025
- 114 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Marion County School Board’s recent meeting on September 23, 2025, was highlighted by the celebration of student achievements, recognition of staff efforts, and discussions about mentorship programs and community engagement. The board also addressed facility improvements and strategic partnerships.
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 9/23/25
- 09/23/2025
- 94 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners meeting was dominated by discussions about the housing trust fund, with the board narrowly deciding against a proposal to allocate an additional $200,000 to the fund. The meeting also included discussions on budgetary matters, including a proposed increase in the property tax levy for 2026.
- CO
- Larimer County
- 9/23/25
- 09/23/2025
- 144 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Poudre School Board meeting primarily concentrated on two developments: the introduction of a new advanced manufacturing lab at the Career Tech Center and the opening of the Adolescent Care Unit at the Longview campus.
- MN
- Crow Wing County
- 9/23/25
- 09/23/2025
- 65 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Brainerd Transportation Advisory Committee recently delved into the future of transit services, weighing the pros and cons of transitioning from third-party contracting to an in-house operation. The committee’s discussions were sparked by a consultant’s presentation of various scenarios, financial analyses, and potential implications for local governance and taxpayer impact.