- Filters
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 6/25/25
- 06/25/2025
- 105 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Sayreville Borough Zoning Board convened to deliberate on several applications, notably denying a proposal for a new fence installation due to concerns over property lines, visibility, and safety. The board emphasized the need for adherence to local zoning ordinances, particularly regarding setback requirements and compliance with safety regulations.
- NJ
- Morris County
- 6/25/25
- 07/03/2025
- 72 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Parsippany-Troy Hills Zoning Board meeting on June 25, 2025, featured discussions on several development applications, including a mixed-use building on North Bewick Road and a residential renovation on Hillside Terrace. Central to the meeting were debates over parking arrangements, building coverage variances, and community impact.
- MO
- Jackson County
- 6/25/25
- 116 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Kansas City School Board tackled topics, including the approval for participation in the Success Ready Student Network (SRSN) aimed at overhauling educational assessments, alongside important financial decisions like budget amendments and capital improvements.
- NJ
- Passaic County
- 6/25/25
- 06/26/2025
- 111 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Pompton Lakes Borough Council meeting, held on June 25, 2025, was marked by public scrutiny and serious allegations concerning the leadership of the police department. Residents voiced concerns about the management style of Police Chief Derek Clark, questioning the council’s handling of promotions and transparency within the department. The meeting also addressed community issues, such as redevelopment projects and public safety, with discussions on ongoing lawsuits and interim leadership arrangements.
- NJ
- Union County
- 6/25/25
- 06/25/2025
- 150 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Union County Zoning Board meeting saw a decision as it unanimously voted down a proposal to subdivide an oversized lot into three parcels for the development of new homes. The proposal, which required a D1 use variance and several C variances, was met with substantial opposition from local residents concerned about the impact on their neighborhood’s character and infrastructure.