- MA
- Essex County
- 6/24/25
- 06/24/2025
- 48 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting of the Danvers Planning Board, members engaged in a discussion on the draft transportation needs assessment report, emphasizing the intricacies of transportation planning, zoning bylaws, and community engagement. The meeting, led by Josh Mars, the town’s principal planner, aimed to gather feedback on the report’s recommendations, which highlighted the need for improvements in walkability, transit services, and sustainable development.
- MA
- Suffolk County
- 6/24/25
- 06/24/2025
- 123 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Chelsea Planning Board held a meeting to address several developments, including the approval of a liquor license upgrade for a local business and a discussion about a proposed educational facility on Herd Street. These topics were supplemented by conversations around transportation safety and infrastructure improvements within the city.
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 6/24/25
- 07/02/2025
- 27 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Easthampton City Council meeting focused on addressing complications surrounding the century-old sewer infrastructure in the New City neighborhood. Adjustmentsttention was placed on the legal challenges of accessing sewer lines running through private properties and the need for obtaining easements to facilitate future maintenance. Discussion also included concerns about road ownership and the potential impact of repairs on residents.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 6/23/25
- 06/23/2025
- 66 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the Edison Town Council meeting on June 23, 2025, residents voiced concerns about ongoing park renovations, safety at intersections, and the need for more community engagement.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 6/23/25
- 06/24/2025
- 29 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Palisades Park Borough Council meeting centered on the need to resolve issues surrounding several ordinances, including ordinances 2025-18 and 2025-9, which are tied to ongoing litigation and potential legal consequences for the borough. The council grappled with discrepancies in information packets and the necessity for council members to amend their abstentions to avoid breaching previously approved settlement agreements.