- Filters
- NJ
- Essex County
- 8/5/24
- 08/05/2024
- 109 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In its recent meeting, the Millburn Town Zoning Board approved a fence variance for a corner lot property on Allen Drive, despite discussions on safety and aesthetic implications. The decision came after thorough deliberation on the challenges posed by the lot’s steep slope and unique shape, as well as the potential impact on neighborhood character.
- FL
- Miami-Dade County
- 7/18/24
- 07/18/2024
- 51 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Biscayne Park Planning Board meeting, members approved a contentious setback requirement for a new swimming pool at 11807 Northeast 11th Place, following a debate over the proposal to partially demolish an existing house to accommodate the construction. The board also tackled a range of other construction applications, including the denial of solar panel installation due to uneven placement, and window installations for a garage conversion.
- MA
- Middlesex County
- 7/11/24
- 07/11/2024
- 42 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Chelmsford Zoning Board of Appeals meeting, a special permit for a new garage addition on King Street was granted approval. This decision followed a review of the project’s impact on building coverage, floor area ratio, and neighborhood character.
- NJ
- Morris County
- 6/25/24
- 06/27/2024
- 82 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Long Hill Planning Board meeting on June 25th, 2024, was marked by discussions on residential shed and fence regulations. The board grappled with various issues, ranging from shed size and setback requirements to the implications of new ordinances for home offices and signs.
- FL
- Pinellas County
- 6/20/24
- 06/20/2024
- 124 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the St. Pete Beach Board of Adjustment addressed several variance requests and discussed a significant text amendment to the Land Development Code. Among the cases, the most compelling involved a property on Casablanca Avenue, where the owners, Mike and Kimberly Clark, sought a variance to install a pool that did not comply with the standard setback requirements. Despite the staff’s recommendation for approval with conditions, the Board ultimately voted to deny the variance request, citing a failure to meet the necessary criteria.