Bernardsville Planning Board Approves Variances for a property on Turbo Lane and Washington Road Projects

Overview: The Bernardsville Planning Board recently convened to deliberate on applications involving properties on Turbo Lane and Washington Road, resulting in the approval of dimensional variances for both projects. The meeting also touched on pending applications and the scheduling of future meetings.

Margate Planning Board Approves Property Developments

Overview: At the latest Margate Planning Board meeting, property developments were approved, including the conversion of a preschool into residential units and the construction of new homes with required variances. The board granted the variances after thorough discussions, recognizing the unique circumstances of each case and the minimal impact on the surrounding neighborhoods.

Princeton Zoning Board Approves New Home Construction Despite Size Concerns and Neighborhood Impact

Overview: The Princeton Zoning Board of Adjustment convened electronically via Zoom on July 24, 2024, tackling several significant cases, including the approval of a new two-story home on Ewing Street despite concerns about lot size, neighborhood character, and potential flooding.

Flemington Planning Board Debates Historic Property’s Legal Status

Overview: The Flemington Planning Board recently convened to deliberate on several matters, with the most issue being the legal status of a property’s usage as a multifamily dwelling. The board grappled with the question of whether the property, located on Main Street, had been legally utilized as a four-family structure prior to the enactment of zoning laws in 1975. The property’s legal status sparked a complex debate over the sufficiency of historical evidence presented by the property owner, who has owned the property since 1996.

Norton Zoning Board Grapples with Property Frontage and Expansion Issues

Overview: The Norton Zoning Board’s recent meeting was marked by discussions on a series of property-related appeals and variances, with a focal point being the contested frontage of a Samet Street property. The applicant’s representative argued that the property in question had sufficient frontage on Big Nell Street to be deemed buildable. However, the board and town council challenged this claim, leading to a detailed debate on whether Big Nell Street could be legitimately considered a street and if it met necessary frontage requirements. Further complicating matters, the board grappled with determining the ownership and status of Big Nell Street itself, questioning if it was a subdivision or a private way and who held ownership. The debate touched upon the historical and legal interpretations of the street’s status, with the board eventually denying the appeal against the building inspector’s decision, which had initially rejected a building permit application citing the lack of adequate frontage.