- Filters
- MA
- Bristol County
- 4/22/26
- 04/22/2026
- 23 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Westport Cable Advisory Committee tackled issues including the long-standing fiber connectivity problems within school facilities and the financial implications of shifting cable service preferences among residents. The committee explored potential solutions and funding alternatives as they navigated these enduring challenges.
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 4/22/26
- 04/23/2026
- 238 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Easthampton City Council meeting on April 22, 2026, involved discussions on a climate change super fund resolution, the prospective sale of a historic property, and several financial appropriations, each with implications for the community’s future.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 4/21/26
- 04/21/2026
- 27 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Leonia School Board meeting addressed issues, notably the termination of a contractor responsible for delays in the science wing project. The board is seeking a new contractor to maintain project momentum. Additional topics included the district’s harassment, intimidation, and bullying (HIB) grades, recognition for music education, and updates on school events and policies.
- NJ
- Union County
- 4/21/26
- 04/21/2026
- 20 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Westfield Town Council meeting, updates were provided on the transformation of Quimby Street into a permanent pedestrian plaza, alongside discussions on public safety measures, budget approvals, and community events. The council also recognized community services and addressed logistical changes due to local infrastructure repairs.
- MN
- Olmsted County
- 4/21/26
- 04/23/2026
- 122 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Oronoco City Council meeting on April 21, 2026, was marked by debate over zoning regulations, particularly concerning residential lot sizes. The council ultimately voted to reduce the minimum lot size for new developments from 14,000 to 13,000 square feet. This decision was accompanied by discussions on community character, development pressure, and potential financial impacts.