- Filters
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 3/9/26
- 03/09/2026
- 148 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a March 9, 2026, meeting, the Jackson Township Planning Board reviewed several topics, including the approval of capital improvement projects at Six Flags Great Adventure and discussions on a proposed subdivision on Toms River Road. The meeting also addressed procedural and environmental issues related to multiple applications.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 3/9/26
- 03/09/2026
- 96 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Englewood City Council convened for a special meeting to address pressing amendments to affordable housing ordinances, driven by a looming March 15th deadline to meet state-mandated housing obligations. The council discussed the introduction of overlay zones to facilitate affordable housing development and the complications that have arisen from ongoing legal challenges.
- MN
- Hennepin County
- 3/9/26
- 03/09/2026
- 161 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Bloomington City Council meeting, discussions were held concerning franchise fees and their impact on the community, as well as the city’s Urban Forest Master Plan. The council navigated issues surrounding utility costs and urban forestry management.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 3/9/26
- 03/09/2026
- 197 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Washington Township Council meeting, discussions on affordable housing development plans and their implications for the township took center stage. Council members and residents deliberated on the township’s housing element and fair share plan, addressing concerns about potential developments and their impact on the community.
- NJ
- Morris County
- 3/9/26
- 03/13/2026
- 332 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Morris Town Council meeting, the primary focus was on the township’s fourth-round affordable housing plan, which involves several proposed ordinances aimed at meeting state mandates. The council’s efforts to address these obligations were met with public scrutiny, as residents voiced concerns over the plan’s impact on local infrastructure, community character, and environmental sustainability.