The primary discussion revolved around the fire safety measures for the proposed building. The application included a 12,100 square foot mixed-use building with necessary buffer zones and 62 parking spaces, meeting the requirements, including credits for electric vehicle parking spaces. A professional engineer provided a detailed presentation of the site plan, emphasizing the need for design waivers due to unique site conditions, such as the proximity of the proposed driveway to the property line.

Adjustmentsttention was given to the recommendations from the Fire Official, particularly the request for a dry hydrant system. Some board members stressed the importance of having a dry hydrant in place. One board member highlighted the necessity of proactive fire safety measures, stating that “saving money doesn’t save lives.” The applicant expressed concerns about the feasibility of installing a dry hydrant, given the absence of plans for water main extensions in the near future.

The debate extended to the adequacy of the building’s fire safety protocols and the necessity of sidewalks in the area. A board member recounted a recent incident where a cyclist was hit by a car. The applicant was willing to contribute to a pedestrian fund if sidewalks were not built, citing the lack of existing sidewalks in the vicinity.

Traffic considerations were also a focal point, with a traffic impact analysis estimating approximately 30 trips during the morning peak hour and 50 during the afternoon peak hour. The analysis projected that the site driveway would operate at a level of service A in the morning and B in the afternoon. However, concerns were raised about the need for a deceleration lane for vehicles turning right into the site and a left-turn lane for eastbound traffic. The police department’s letter mentioned that a deceleration lane was not necessary, given the project’s size and the nature of the county roadway.

One resident emphasized the need for sidewalks to accommodate future bus services, advocating that all applicants should be required to install sidewalks. Another inquired about the lighting plan for the parking lot, expressing frustration over existing lighting issues from adjacent properties. The board discussed the necessity of providing appropriate landscaping to mitigate the impact of the commercial development on the surrounding residential area, with suggestions for a double row of ten to twelve-foot arborvitaes to block car headlights.

The meeting also addressed the operational aspects of the new building, including the maintenance of proposed fencing and landscaping. Concerns were raised about responsibility for maintaining the area between the fence and the property line, with a suggestion for a maintenance agreement with the township. The applicant’s representative confirmed a commitment to maintaining the stormwater management area behind the fence.

As the discussion continued, participants highlighted the need for compliance with fire safety regulations and the importance of clear documentation of agreements made during the meeting. The board members emphasized that adherence to the Fire Official’s recommendations should not be negotiable, given their significance for safety.

The Jackson Planning Board also reviewed an application for the Congregation Mikvah of Jackson, proposing a 11,679 square foot, one-story mikvah on South New Prospect Road. The facility would feature distinct areas for women, men, and kitchen utensils, with specific operational hours to avoid overlap. The board reviewed the application.