The primary focus of the meeting was the AA Truck Parts Inc. application, which sought to establish a facility on West Commodore Boulevard. The project required a D1 variance due to its location in a limited commercial zone. The applicant’s attorney revisited prior discussions from an April meeting, emphasizing changes made to address concerns from both the board and nearby residents. These included operational hours from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and a commitment to prevent truck drop-offs after 6:00 p.m.

The applicant proposed several site improvements, including an office structure, a chain-link fence, and a 50-foot buffer zone along the western and southern boundaries of the site—exceeding the typical 10-foot requirement. To further mitigate impact, they offered to install an earth berm with a double row of evergreen and deciduous trees for visual screening, and a solid fence along the western boundary to reduce noise and visual disturbances for neighboring properties.

Noise control was a significant topic of discussion. The applicant affirmed compliance with the noise ordinance, which limits decibel levels at the property line, and noted that the site design incorporated setbacks and buffering to mitigate noise. Code enforcement would handle any complaints, equipped with noise meters to ensure compliance. The board clarified that while daily operations typically do not violate noise limits, the town has resources to investigate any complaints.

Public comments highlighted various community concerns. A resident, Lisel Teresi, raised issues regarding property lines, dead trees, water drainage, and lighting. Teresi emphasized the need for clear operational hours to prevent 24/7 activity and highlighted potential drainage problems due to the site’s natural water flow. The applicant agreed to conduct a boundary survey and ensure proper water drainage under the solid fence.

Another resident, Carlos Martins, expressed worries about peak-hour noise from diesel trucks and potential air pollution. He questioned the number of trucks expected during busy times. The applicant responded by affirming compliance with regulations and characterizing the business as a less intense use compared to potential office developments.

Residents also voiced concerns about the project’s impact on traffic, safety, and the well-being of approximately 100 homeowners and the nearby Jackson Gardens, which houses 500 units. They argued that granting the variance would violate local codes and negatively affect the community.

In response to these concerns, the applicant highlighted efforts to minimize negative impacts, including the installation of a solid fence, additional landscaping, and a keypad entry system to monitor business operations. They emphasized the necessity of the business within the township, noting existing violations related to the parking of commercial vehicles at residential properties.

Board members commended the applicant’s revisions and efforts to address public comments. One member noted that the proposed business would not substantially detract from public good or impair the zoning plan.