The most significant topic of the evening was the deliberation over the Howling Woods Farm’s use variance application. The sanctuary, which has been part of the Jackson community for about 20 years, provides a refuge for wolf-dog hybrids and is a nonprofit dedicated to educating the public about these animals. Representatives from the sanctuary underscored their mission to dispel myths and negative stereotypes associated with wolf dogs, emphasizing the educational and community outreach efforts they undertake.

A representative from the sanctuary, identified as “Pat,” shared personal insights into the operations and the sanctuary’s impact on both the animals and the community. Pat articulated a deep connection with the animals, stating that many have never known another home outside the farm. This sentiment was echoed by Ana Mija, a volunteer, who highlighted the joy these animals bring to her life and the importance of public education to combat misconceptions. Mija’s testimony reinforced the sanctuary’s role as a vital educational resource, with visitors from various states recognizing its contributions.

The board revealed curiosity regarding local community opinions, particularly about potential noise or environmental complaints. However, it was noted that the sanctuary has not received any such complaints, which the board members found noteworthy. A board member remarked on the significance of this support, stating, “I think that speaks volumes,” in reference to the lack of negative feedback about Howling Woods Farm.

The board also examined procedural and technical aspects of the application, including the presentation of a letter related to the use variance, which some members opposed including as an exhibit. They stressed the importance of adhering to procedural requirements for public review. Despite procedural hurdles, the sanctuary’s representatives were able to present their case, introducing various exhibits and detailing the sanctuary’s operations, including the dietary and care practices for the wolf dogs.

Testimony from a sanctuary supervisor, Colleen Case, provided further context to the sanctuary’s history and operations. Case explained that the sanctuary operates on donations and contributions, with no actual wolves residing on the property, only wolf-dog hybrids. She described the sanctuary’s educational mission, which includes hosting public tours and participating in community events to promote conservation and dispel myths about wolves. The sanctuary also adheres to safety and USDA welfare standards.

The board’s discussion touched on the sanctuary’s impact on traffic and environmental concerns, with the representative affirming that no such issues arise from its operations. The board planner requested additional details about the facility’s uses and activities, including the maximum number of wolf dogs allowed, which is currently proposed at 20.

In a broader context, the meeting addressed other zoning matters, such as the unanimous approval of several resolutions. These included variance relief for an accessory structure on Bane Lane, approval for a new single-family dwelling on an undersized lot on Endiro Road, and denial of a side yard setback variance for a shed on Meadow Run Court. Additionally, the board granted a time extension for 528 LLC’s preliminary final site plan due to delays in receiving county approvals.

The board also handled procedural elements, such as carrying Noe Guerra’s use variance application to a future meeting due to the absence of a full board and entering an executive session to discuss litigation matters. A settlement agreement related to Moak versus the township was approved following this closed session.