During the meeting, the Board addressed a significant case involving two substandard lots that did not meet the minimum required lot area and width. The applicant sought approval to construct a new single-family home, which necessitated a variance due to the nonconforming nature of the lots, which have been in existence since before the implementation of the current zoning code. The staff endorsed the applicant’s request, stating that it met all six criteria necessary for variance approval. After a discussion, the Board agreed and granted the variance, allowing the applicant to move forward with the construction plans.

This decision underscored the Board’s role in balancing the integrity of the zoning code with the practical needs of residents looking to build or expand their homes in areas with outdated lot sizes. By authorizing this variance, the Board recognized that the proposed construction would not confer any special privileges on the applicant, but rather would enable the reasonable use of the property.

Another case discussed at the meeting involved an application for a two-story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. The applicants, Christopher Dell and Mary Bethell, cited a growing family and the need for more space as the driving factors behind their request. They were seeking a combined side yard setback and lot coverage variance. Board members inquired about the proposed setback and lot coverage percentages, as well as whether the neighbors had been consulted about the addition. There was a suggestion to table the agenda item to allow for further research, particularly concerning a possible exception for the rear yard setback. However, the outcome of this discussion was not explicitly detailed in the transcript provided.

In a related case, the Board examined another application for variances to construct a new single-family dwelling. The applicant highlighted that the proposed home would share similarities with an existing structure on an adjoining lot, which had previously been granted a variance. Notably, the lots involved in this case were also non-conforming lots of record, a status dating back to 1922. This historical context played a part in the Board’s considerations, as they deliberated on the requested variances for lot coverage and setbacks.

Additionally, the Board deliberated on a request for a variance to increase the concrete walkway around a swimming pool from 35% to 41.18% of the lot coverage. The applicant attributed the need for the increase to a miscalculation in the previous measurement of the walkway. The board members acknowledged that the additional coverage was necessary to facilitate adequate access around the pool. After discussing the unique hardship presented by the lot and the implications of the proposed expansion, the variance was approved.

The Board’s decisions in these cases reflect a nuanced approach to local zoning challenges, taking into consideration the historical context of the lots in question, the needs of residents for functional living spaces, and adherence to zoning principles. By granting these variances, the Board has facilitated the continuation of Jacksonville Beach’s residential development while managing the complexities inherent in evolving urban landscapes.