The most discussion centered on Shannon L. Smith’s application for variances concerning her property on Gordon Avenue. Smith requested to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 17 feet and the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.4 feet. The application aimed to replace a dilapidated porch and extend it by 8 feet. Smith assured the board that her neighbors were supportive, saying, “they’re completely fine with it all of them,” and highlighted the new neighbor’s enthusiasm about the project.

The board’s inquiries mainly focused on the dimensions and impact of the proposed addition. Smith clarified that the steps would align with the deck, avoiding any back yard encroachment. With no public opposition, the board unanimously approved Smith’s variance request, concluding it met the necessary criteria based on the evidence and testimony presented.

The next significant case involved Justin Lurman’s request for multiple variances for his property on North 8th Street. Lurman sought to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet and the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 10 feet, along with an increase in lot coverage from 35% to 41.6%. He highlighted three hardships: the existing structure’s placement, the undersized lot, and the property’s angle, which complicated construction efforts.

Lurman’s presentation faced scrutiny regarding the minimal development needed for the property. The board expressed concerns about the visual impact and massing of the proposed additions. Despite these discussions, the transcript did not specify the outcome of the vote.

Another notable variance request came from Christopher Calvin, who sought approval to construct a pool on Oakwood Road. Calvin emphasized that the irregularly shaped lot and existing easements minimized the impact on neighboring properties. He planned to remove a nonconforming shed and confirmed that the pool’s deck would be minimal to comply with setback requirements.

Calvin’s application included a three-and-a-half-foot rear yard setback and a five-foot side yard setback. A public member, John Spitler, raised concerns about the measurements, but Calvin clarified that the decking would be limited, and existing pavers in poor condition would be removed. The board unanimously approved Calvin’s request after thorough discussions and a roll call vote.

Additionally, the board addressed DOA 24-1 Z41, a case proposing to expand a living space from 900 to 2,000 square feet due to the irregular shape of the lot. The applicant’s design considered the challenges posed by existing structures and setbacks. The board found the requested coverage reasonable and unanimously approved the variance.

Lastly, the board discussed routine updates and future meetings, including a workshop on the Land Development Code (LDC) scheduled shortly after the meeting. The upcoming board meeting was set for September 17th, with three items on the agenda.