The proposed changes to Mangoes involved not only renovations to the existing establishment but also the addition of a mixed-use project featuring ground floor retail or office space, upstairs restaurants with outdoor seating, and the demolition of adjacent parcels. While staff recommended approval, concerns were raised regarding the historical status of the properties to be demolished. Board members also grappled with the potential implications of zoning changes on the residential character of the area and questioned how the development aligns with corridor designations and the city’s stance on liquor licenses for beachside restaurants. A representative from the applicant’s legal team attended the meeting to provide details on the proposal and offer clarification on the board’s concerns.

A significant part of the meeting delved into the restroom updates and renovations for a building within the CRA’s purview. A property owner discussed adding a new women’s restroom and expanding the north side for a new men’s restroom. The adherence to the Redevelopment District zoning process came under scrutiny by an individual representing adjacent property owners and residents. They pointed out discrepancies in the application and questioned whether the necessary procedural steps had been followed. The debate unfolded over the legality and procedural aspects, with the city attorney eventually providing guidance on the process. There was a strong sentiment among some board members for the need to have a clear downtown district plan and the importance of relying on professional advice.

The board also faced challenges regarding the legal procedures and their role in making redevelopment recommendations. The discussion exposed differing opinions on the rights of affected parties to present evidence and question witnesses, with the city attorney clarifying that the Land Development code does not grant such rights during the CRA’s proceedings. The extent of public comment and the board’s adherence to the Land Development code were points of contention, as was the CRA’s role in economic development and the preservation of existing property values and the pedestrian-friendly nature of First Street.

A motion was made to recommend approval of the Mangoes project, stressing the importance of considering the pedestrian quality of First Street. The motion was passed by the board.