Advocates for the bird-friendly standards highlighted the statistic that glass collisions result in up to a billion bird deaths annually in the United States. Speakers at the meeting stressed the necessity of adopting measures such as materials with low threat factors and addressing bird hazard installations to mitigate these fatalities. They argued that the financial implications of implementing bird-friendly designs are minor when incorporated into the design process and do not compromise architectural beauty or development potential.

Public comments underscored the need for these standards, with individuals sharing personal anecdotes of bird collisions in Jersey City and other urban areas. An architect and avid bird watcher recounted her experiences in New York City, where bird-safe glass has become a standard practice due to legislative requirements. She advocated for similar measures in Jersey City to protect bird populations and contribute to sustainable development.

However, not all attendees supported the proposed amendments. Some expressed skepticism regarding the validity of the widely cited figure of one billion bird deaths, questioning the feasibility and enforcement of the legislation. Concerns were raised about the availability of inspectors and how compliance would be monitored effectively. Despite this opposition, the overall sentiment among board members leaned towards supporting the inclusion of bird-friendly standards, acknowledging the ecological and community benefits.

The motion included changes to extend protections to all new constructions and renovations.

In addition to the bird-friendly standards, the board reviewed several development proposals, including a preliminary and final major site plan for a property on Bergen Avenue. This proposal involved a preliminary and final major site plan with C variances, which had been under discussion in previous meetings. The applicant’s representatives presented modifications to the site plan, focusing on fire safety concerns due to the building’s proximity to a neighboring church.

The architect for the project outlined changes made to the building design, including the installation of fire-rated windows on the second and third floors and the elimination of ground-floor windows to enhance safety and accessibility. The board emphasized the importance of clear communication and cooperation between the applicant and the church to reach a satisfactory resolution to the concerns raised.

Public comments during the meeting also raised concerns about the lack of adequate communication between developers and the community. A council aide noted that residents from Highland Avenue, Dalb, and Bergen Avenue had not been engaged regarding changes made to the project. This absence of community engagement was framed as a significant oversight, prompting calls for the board to uphold strict standards and consider the implications for the surrounding community.

Another speaker, a licensed professional engineer, expressed concerns about safety protocols during the demolition phase of the project. They pointed out that the contractor had obtained a demolition permit without proper documentation approved by the city, insisting on robust safety measures to protect churchgoers, neighbors, and pedestrians during construction. These comments highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in the development process, with residents advocating for a voice in project planning before changes are finalized.