The Jersey City Planning Board recently approved several major development projects amid rising public concern, putting a spotlight on the city’s urban renewal efforts. The most contentious of these projects are a 20-unit apartment complex on Glennwood Avenue and an eight-story addition to an existing building on Monitor Street. Both projects faced extensive public commentary regarding potential infrastructural and community impacts.
In the November 14th meeting, the board approved the construction plans for the Glennwood Avenue property despite concerns about the lack of a backup plan for the building’s wastewater system. Commissioner Torres voiced unease with the absence of a backup generator and pump for the 20-unit building, leading to a board agreement to impose a condition requiring these additions. Councilman Richard Boggiano urged the board to prioritize community concerns over developer interests. Charles Height, the developer’s planner, presented the proposed variances and plans for the multi-family development, sparking a need for further understanding by the board.
The Glennwood Avenue project, featuring 20 units with two of them being affordable housing, has been a subject of public debate due to the architect’s proposal for larger setbacks, less parking spaces, and a reduced number of stories in the building. The architect, Mr. Hedges, reassured the board and the public about the building’s compliance with zoning regulations, mitigating rooftop impacts, and ensuring the same quality finishes for the affordable units as the market-rate units.
Public comment was robust, with residents like Janette Rundo and Pam Andes exconcerns ranging from potential flooding issues, the height of the building, the lack of affordable housing, to the need for community meetings and green spaces. Despite some objections, staff recommended approval of the project with certain conditions, leading to the board’s final approval.
Another significant project discussed was the proposed eight-story addition to an existing building on Monitor Street, which would add an additional 70 residential units and a child care center on the ground floor. The project, presented as an as-of-right development under the Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan, faced opposition from Shireen McCormack and resident Mr. Manzo, who criticized the lack of green spaces, setbacks, and community involvement.
Despite the opposition, the board ultimately approved the project, maintaining that the addition would be a valuable contribution to the neighborhood. Public comment, however, remained critical, with residents like Mr. Herrick raising concerns about the construction phase’s impact on nearby properties and the lack of low-income housing in the project.
In addition to these projects, the board discussed amendments to the Newport and Harborside Cove Station Redevelopment plans. The amendments aim to modernize standards, encourage development, and clarify that the mall in the area is not closing. Despite some disagreements among the board members regarding access and parking, the board recommended approval of the amendments to the City Council.