03:03The board’s discussion about the 119 Merit Street project was marked by a series of challenges related to the property’s existing conditions and proposed uses. The applicant sought multiple variances due to the lot’s constraints. The proposal had been revised following previous feedback, which had raised concerns about traffic queuing and the necessity of a roundabout.

51:05Residents voiced their dissatisfaction with the site’s current state, citing issues such as inadequate maintenance, light pollution, noise, and unauthorized activities. A resident described the property as being filled with trash and commercial vehicles, questioning whether the proposed changes would adequately address these concerns.

01:15:59In response to the criticisms, the applicant revised the design to eliminate the roundabout, opting instead for increased green space, which was expected to enhance the site’s aesthetics and functionality. The landscape plan, presented by a landscape architect, included formalized curbs, a row of mixed evergreen trees and shrubs, and additional plantings along the southern boundary to provide a buffer between the parking area and the street.

59:34Despite these efforts, residents remained wary of the owner’s intentions, citing a history of neglect and failure to adhere to previous approvals. The sentiment was echoed by board members, who emphasized the importance of developers following through on commitments to avoid further deterioration of neighborhood conditions.

01:31:14The board ultimately approved the application with seven conditions, emphasizing the need for enhanced landscaping and the removal of the roundabout. This decision was met with mixed reactions.

01:51:16Another topic at the meeting was the development proposal for a property on Grove Street, which involved the construction of a five-story building with 108 residential units and retail space. This project, in compliance with the city’s redevelopment plan, sought a density bonus for additional units and a lot coverage bonus due to an extensive green roof. The proposal included several features aimed at sustainability and community engagement, such as permeable pavement, bio-retention basins, and electric vehicle parking.

09:45The board reviewed the project’s architectural and landscape designs, which incorporated elements intended to blend with the surrounding area. The facade was designed with brick and metal panels, while the landscape plan featured ornamental and native plants, bio-retention areas, and private terraces. Despite the project’s alignment with redevelopment goals, concerns were raised about the placement of an Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) box, required by utility regulations, which was positioned in a front yard due to site constraints.

The board’s approval underscored the need for ongoing dialogue between developers, the city, and the community to address concerns and optimize project outcomes.

01:41:59In addition to these major projects, the meeting addressed several other items, including the certification of two artists and amendments to existing ordinances. The board approved changes to the review agent procedures, clarified stormwater requirements, and discussed modifications to the preliminary and final major subdivision for Harborside Place and Grove Street.