The most notable topic at the meeting was the approval of case Z2024-000063, concerning a proposed two-family dwelling on Decal Avenue. The applicant presented plans for a three-story building with two residential units, emphasizing sustainable design elements. The proposal included unique landscaping features, such as low-maintenance Japanese-themed plants, bamboo fencing, and permeable pavers designed to enhance stormwater management. The permeable pavers, with gravel joints, are intended to facilitate water absorption into the soil, thereby reducing runoff into the sewer system.

The development will feature a ten-foot rear yard designed with Japanese garden principles, using a plastic geogrid over gravel storage beds to further manage stormwater. The front yard will be planted with native New Jersey species, and parking will be accommodated by eliminating an existing curb cut. However, due to the narrow sidewalk, the city’s tree superintendent required the applicant to contribute to the city tree fund instead of planting a street tree.

The proposed building includes three floors and a cellar, with a roof deck featuring solar panels and landscaped trays with low-maintenance succulent plants. The exterior will reflect the neighborhood’s character, using vinyl siding and brick cladding, and incorporating design elements like a cornice and warm earth tones to complement nearby structures. The applicant argued that the project would enhance the neighborhood by transforming an underutilized property into a functional two-family home, providing additional housing options, and improving the visual environment.

Board members expressed concerns about stormwater management, but the applicant assured that the design, featuring sustainable landscaping and solar panels, effectively addressed these issues. A motion to approve the project was made and unanimously passed, with all present commissioners voting in favor.

Another noteworthy discussion involved case Z2025-000A2, an appeal regarding an administrative office determination for a property on Stegman Place. The applicant’s representatives requested an adjournment to secure legal counsel, citing difficulties in finding an available attorney. The developer’s attorney contended that the case lacked merit, stating that the necessary permits had been obtained. The board agreed to carry the case over to the next meeting in March 2026, emphasizing the importance of the applicant securing legal representation by then.

During the meeting, the board also addressed routine matters, such as the memorialization of resolutions from previous applications. This included a one-year extension for prior approval and a site plan approval with variances. The resolutions were discussed and approved, with some humor and light-hearted exchanges among board members, contributing to a collegial atmosphere.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on stenographic services, where discrepancies in the hourly rate from previous agreements were noted. A vote to approve the contract passed without opposition, and the session ended with camaraderie among board members, highlighted by laughter and friendly exchanges.