The fiscal year 2026 general fund operating budget was a focal point, particularly concerning the proposed $25,000 increase for the library book budget. The finance committee had already approved this additional funding, but the board’s consideration of it highlighted internal disagreements. Some members expressed difficulty supporting the library’s increased allocation, citing changes in other departments, such as cuts to the planning department and reduced transfer station hours. The library budget was noted as the minimum required for state funding eligibility, emphasizing the importance of maintaining this financial threshold. Ultimately, the board voted three to two against the additional library funding, choosing to proceed with the budget as initially proposed by the finance committee.

Another discussion revolved around a proposed restructuring of the town’s water and sewer departments under a new public works department. The plan aimed to enhance coordination and efficiency by consolidating operations while maintaining the roles of existing water and sewer commissioners. The proposal suggested that a public works director would oversee daily operations, addressing long-term capital plans and budgetary needs in collaboration with the commissioners. Although the idea of merging the departments was mentioned, it was not pursued, with some preferring to delay such decisions to fully explore their implications.

In the realm of infrastructure, the board addressed plans for the reconstruction of the Exit 20 intersection and the potential creation of a double roundabout at the Tarland and Summer Street intersection, known locally as the Big Y intersection. These projects are part of a broader transportation improvement plan (TIP) crucial for securing federal funding. The anticipated timeline for the Exit 20 reconstruction has shifted to 2027 or 2028, contingent on design costs.

The meeting also covered the approval of several town meeting warrant articles, including those related to the wastewater department, renewable energy enterprise fund budget, and revolving funds. Article Six concerning the leeching field debt expense reallocation sparked debate, with some members opposing the town covering a portion of the debt service, citing promises made to voters in prior years. Despite this contention, other articles, such as the establishment of a police activities revolving fund, faced skepticism and were voted down.

Additionally, the board approved the Route 3A and 53 corridor study, which seeks to assess road conditions and land use. The study, presented by the town planner, aimed to identify necessary infrastructure improvements and enhance community identity along the corridor. A historical context was provided, noting the transition from a predominantly residential area to a commercial and car-oriented landscape.

The board also dealt with an open meeting law complaint filed by Patrick Higgins, which accused the board of procedural errors. The board agreed to amend the meeting minutes to include a roll call vote on all decisions and delegated the response to town council. The chair emphasized the importance of transparency and diligence in addressing the complaint.