The board’s primary focus was on the regulation of kratom, a substance described by one board member as highly addictive and likened to opioids, though not technically classified as such. This member expressed concern over the substance’s prevalence at local smoke shops and convenience stores, emphasizing its potential harm and the need for immediate action. The member mentioned reaching out to the police chief for more information and noted that other towns had already begun implementing bans on kratom.

Discussion among board members revealed some confusion over the classification of kratom, but there was agreement on its addictive properties. Legislative efforts at the state level were acknowledged, with pending bills aiming to regulate or ban kratom. However, board members agreed that local action could be more expedient. The possibility of the Board of Health enacting regulations was discussed, which would involve holding a public hearing to gather community input.

Concerns about public backlash were raised, with one member recalling previous instances of community turnout opposing regulations. Despite this, there was a strong inclination toward proactive measures to prevent further incidents related to kratom use. The board considered drafting a regulation based on existing models from other towns, with the goal of moving swiftly to enact it while planning for a public hearing.

The board also discussed categorizing kratom more strictly, potentially restricting its sale to individuals over 18 and regulating it similarly to scheduled drugs. This prompted reflections on the current market for kratom and the lack of controls over its distribution. The urgency of the situation was underscored by references to past incidents of addiction and deaths linked to kratom use, with members emphasizing the need for swift action balanced with community engagement.

In addition to kratom, the meeting addressed other issues impacting the community. There was concern about a potential sewage contamination scenario near the waterfront, with ongoing inspections revealing complications due to personal belongings left behind in apartments. Allegations were made about 50-gallon drums filled with sewage being buried in the area, raising alarms about public health implications and potential contamination of storm drains leading to the water.

The status of local beaches was also discussed, with positive reports on water quality and low risk for Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE) and West Nile virus. However, the rising incident of EEE in nearby areas prompted discussions on mosquito control efforts. The board also touched on tick surveillance, noting some cases of anaplasmosis while Lyme disease prevalence remained low.

A public service announcement was presented, warning homeowners against using garbage disposals with Title 5 septic systems. The announcement highlighted the risk of excess solids clogging septic tanks and leaching fields, leading to increased costs and system degradation. The board suggested edits to clarify the implications of using garbage disposals, emphasizing the potential need for system upgrades.

Vendor compliance with tobacco regulations was another topic of concern. The board discussed unpaid fines from local vendors, with one facing legal matters. Repeated violations prompted suggestions for a hearing to address these issues, with the potential revocation of tobacco permits for continued non-compliance. The board emphasized the seriousness of compliance and public health safety, noting that after multiple offenses, permit revocation was necessary.

Additionally, there were updates on departmental activities, including progress on addressing blight at properties on Penrook Street and River Street. However, issues persisted with noise complaints and trash management at other locations. Complications also arose regarding illegal apartments, where unregulated living conditions were found.