One notable issue debated at the meeting was the need to replace outdated water meters. The current meters, some dating back to the 1990s, are considered unreliable, raising concerns about accurate water usage reporting. A deadline of December 30 has been set for the completion of this project, although some members suggested this date might be flexible. The enforcement order necessitating these upgrades added complexity to the financial discussions.

In exploring meter replacement options, board members considered alternative vendors. A key distinction was made between the current preferred vendor, which offers a cellular-based system, and others that would require additional infrastructure like poles and radio transmitters. Concerns were voiced about the potential hazards these additions could pose, such as lightning strikes and vehicle accidents. The cellular-based system was seen as advantageous, as it would automatically link each meter to its respective address upon installation, thereby simplifying the process and eliminating the need for additional infrastructure.

Another topic was a proposed rehabilitation center in the convent area, which raised concerns about water quality. The Board scrutinized the plan’s impact on parking spaces within zone two, an area crucial for maintaining water quality. Questions were raised about the increase in impervious land coverage and whether the plans sufficiently addressed these concerns. A motion was made to draft a letter to the planning board clarifying that the site operates on a private water system, absolving the town of maintenance responsibilities.

Tensions arose within the Board over a substantial bill of $44,063 for police details at a recent water commissioner meeting. One board member expressed frustration, questioning the necessity and rationale for a police presence at the meeting. They felt slighted by the implication that such security measures were required. Another defended the decision, citing disruptions at meetings across the Southshore and emphasizing the importance of precautionary safety measures.

The Board also addressed an inquiry from the May family about donating land, which could provide alternative access to a well site. One member advocated accepting the donation, citing its potential benefits for operational efficiency and redundancy. Concerns about the vulnerability of the new well to natural disasters prompted the suggestion that an additional access route would enhance safety.

In personnel matters, a board member highlighted the achievements of Evan Donley, a new hire who passed licensing tests, emphasizing the importance of skilled personnel in managing the town’s water operations. Donley’s ambition and contributions were acknowledged as integral to the department’s success.

The Board turned its attention to a regulatory letter requesting corrective measures. The necessity of having engineering expertise present during these discussions was stressed, given the complexities of the water system’s challenges.

Finally, the idea of organizing an appreciation lunch for town workers was proposed as a way to strengthen relationships and recognize their efforts. While some members supported the lunch, others suggested that personal interactions during shifts could be more effective in building rapport. A joint meeting with the sewer and water departments was proposed for September 16th to explore potential operational efficiencies, emphasizing the importance of regular communication and collaboration to prevent misunderstandings and delays.