The most notable discussion centered on the Indian Pond sewer project, where representatives from CC Construction sought approval for a water meter specifically for hydroseeding purposes over a 13-acre site. Despite an initial question about utilizing treated water from the system, it was clarified that the current infrastructure does not support such use. The board deliberated on future possibilities of making effluent available for irrigation, acknowledging potential additional costs and infrastructure needs. Concerns were expressed regarding the implications of water usage on the existing system, such as possible discoloration or quality issues. The Department of Environmental Protection’s scrutiny necessitated documentation and accountability for water usage, prompting a board member to stress the importance of ensuring water is accounted for appropriately.

Previously, a meter issued to CC Construction had failed, raising questions about the rationale for a new request. The board sought assurance of improved outcomes, particularly given past failures in hydroseeding. The cost implications of necessary hydrant flushing and potential disruptions were also discussed, with inquiries into whether such expenses would be absorbed by the water department or passed to the contractor. Ultimately, the board approved a motion to provide a new meter, emphasizing the need for thorough oversight and documentation.

The conversation then transitioned to the Main Street water project, where a reported dip near the Veterans Memorial on Summer Street was attributed not to trenching by CC Construction but rather to milling and paving processes. The board resolved to send a letter to CC Construction to formally document the issue and leverage the performance and maintenance bonds if needed. Monitoring was deemed necessary, as the dip could be exacerbated by repairs, and more extensive work might be required.

Financial discussions revealed that the operating and Main Street water main accounts held just over $29,000, with a retainage amount of $14,000 due to a contractor and an estimated $4,000 in engineering costs pending. This left under $11,000 as contingency for future expenses.

Groundwater monitoring was addressed with an environmental engineer’s report showing no major concerns. Recent water quality sample results were positive and shared with residents. Repair work following recent rains was underway, as the softened ground revealed leaks needing immediate attention.

Staffing challenges emerged as a significant topic. The unexpected resignation of Mike Scherzer and prior departures of four employees over three years raised concerns about internal communications and staffing stability. The board highlighted the importance of an executive session to discuss these issues in detail, scheduling it for the third of the month, despite complications from Veterans Day. This session would also address budget matters, aligning with efforts to compile necessary reports.

A new Request for Proposals (RFP) for the departmental engineer was considered urgent, given the imminent expiration of the current engineer’s contract at the end of November. Ensuring continuity in engineering services was deemed critical, with emphasis on expediting the process. While the well project’s engineering contract remained active, a separate general agreement was necessary.