A issue discussed at length during the public hearing was the potential reduction in force within the district. The Kinnelon Education Association president articulated the importance of retaining a highly effective staff, citing the district’s reputation for educational excellence. Concurrently, a Spanish teacher expressed unease about changes in class schedules and the possible adverse effects on the world languages program. A science teacher also voiced concerns about the proposed personnel decisions, emphasizing their impact on the educational legacy and future student opportunities.

The board’s proposed budget highlighted a commitment to maintaining the integrity of instructional and co-curricular activities, upgrading technology infrastructure, and addressing key inclusions like KHS security surveillance, a new bus, K5 ELA resources, a partial roof replacement at Stonybrook, phase two of technology infrastructure upgrades, and a one-to-one Chromebook initiative for PRM and KHS grade n. However, the potential loss of programs, especially in science, raised significant worries among students and community members.

During the public comment segment, the impact of potential budget cuts on the science programs was a recurring theme, with students and parents voicing their concerns. A high school student praised the “barcode lab” for imparting valuable life skills, while another student, Cole, articulated the influence of science programs on his personal and academic growth. Zach, involved in the science research club, expressed hopes to continue his participation and serve as a role model for incoming members. Students Jayv and Nathan questioned the future of the science lab time and the continuation of Mrs. Trevi’s impactful role in the department.

Moreover, a junior named Mohammad shared his transformation from disinterest to passion for science, attributing it to the school’s programs and fearing the potential consequences of staffing changes. Student representative Julia stressed the importance of personalized instruction and the need for art class accessibility. The board reassured students of their dedication to maintaining high-quality science education.

Discussions also touched on the importance of streamlining processes to align student requests with staffing levels, given the decline in student numbers. The director of curriculum assured that no programs, clubs, or classes would be eliminated, highlighting the strength of the science department. Concerns about class sizes in math and English departments were also raised, with the need for more efficient scheduling emphasized.

Community members spoke about the unique qualifications of certain teachers, urging the board to reconsider decisions that could lead to the elimination of programs. For instance, a long-term Spanish teacher’s concerns and the contributions of a science supervisor set to lose her job were discussed. The potential loss of STEM programs and their impact on college preparation was a concern, with a parent sharing a letter from her daughter reflecting on the significance of the school’s science and art classes in her collegiate success.

The superintendent acknowledged budget constraints and the need to live within the means, highlighting the challenges and the intent to maintain integrity based on numbers and budget. Updates on the facilities, including roof and HVAC replacements, as well as upcoming summer projects, were addressed. A community member mentioned the receipt of a grant for a wellness center in the schools.