Lac qui Parle Valley School Board Explores New Cell Phone Policy Amid Enrollment Declines and Facility Fee Concerns

The Lac qui Parle Valley School Board meeting delved into potential policy changes regarding student cell phone usage, discussed declining student enrollment and its impact on funding, considered adjustments to facility use fees, and explored strategic plans for future educational goals.

20:09Central to the meeting was the extensive discussion on revising the district’s cell phone usage policy. The board reviewed feedback from a recent survey distributed among staff, families, and students. This survey revealed a significant divide: while the majority of staff and families supported restricting cell phone use during class time, students largely opposed such measures. The proposed guidelines included prohibiting cell phone use during instructional periods, with discussions also considering stricter policies requiring phones to be stored in lockers throughout the school day.

Staff members emphasized the necessity for a consistent policy across all classrooms to prevent confusion and maintain focus during lessons. It was noted that inconsistencies among teachers regarding phone use had led to student misunderstandings. Suggestions were made to integrate phone holders in classrooms as a means to minimize distractions, while ensuring that students could access their phones for emergencies.

Concerns were raised about emergency communication should cell phones be restricted, with families expressing worries about how they could contact their children. The board debated the practicality of these policies and acknowledged the unique geographical challenges of the district, which might necessitate allowing phone access during non-class times.

0:00The meeting also addressed the decline in student enrollment, which has implications for the district’s funding. With 14 of 17 students leaving due to families moving out of the area, the board is tasked with adjusting its future budget. The board noted that changes in how free and reduced lunch counts are recorded could further impact funding calculations, with expectations for more clarity from the state in January.

In financial matters, the board discussed a potential increase in the annual facility use fee, which is currently set at $100 per family. Given the 520 scans for access at the main school, along with other facilities, the board considered raising the fee by $25 to $50 to cover maintenance costs and the facility use monitor’s salary. Balancing accessibility with financial sustainability was a concern, as the board aims to ensure fair use of school facilities while managing the associated expenses.

36:03In addition to these primary topics, the board explored strategic plans for fostering student engagement and educational success. A proposal to incorporate Career and Technical Education (CTE) goals into the Comprehensive Achievement and Civic Readiness Plan was discussed. The goal is for 70% of graduating seniors, who have been enrolled for at least two years, to complete at least one CTE course.

52:53The implementation of a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) was also on the agenda, aimed at providing tailored academic and behavioral interventions based on student needs. The board discussed the importance of collaborative time for teachers to analyze student data and make informed decisions, with the possibility of introducing early release or late start days to facilitate this.

36:03The board also engaged in a broader dialogue about a long-term strategic plan, considering external assistance from the Minnesota School Boards Association or local facilitators to ensure alignment with community interests.

52:53Lastly, the board was briefed on ongoing challenges in maintaining child care services in Madison. A collaborative approach involving local stakeholders is being pursued to address financial shortfalls, with local businesses and organizations contributing to the effort.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: