Lacey School Board Addresses Bus Aide Pay Increase Amid Transportation Challenges

The recent Lacey School Board meeting tackled issues concerning district operations, notably approving a pay raise for bus aides to address retention challenges, highlighting the ongoing student assessment strategies, and discussing various academic achievements and initiatives.

1:05:19Transportation concerns were at the forefront of the meeting, with a focus on the retention of bus aides. A class action lawsuit involving the district was discussed, particularly regarding the loss of aides to other districts offering higher wages. To mitigate this, the board agreed to increase bus aides’ pay from $15.13 to $17 per hour. This wage adjustment aims to make the district more competitive and is expected to be formalized in the upcoming agenda. This decision is crucial as it addresses the immediate need to retain quality aides, which is essential for the safe and efficient operation of the district’s transportation services. Additionally, a shared services agreement with the Manchester School District for a bus aide was mentioned.

16:24Student assessments and academic achievements were another focal point. The district’s use of Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) assessments was highlighted, with these tools being used to track student growth and tailor instruction. The eighth-grade cohort showed notable improvement in math proficiency, although some gaps remain compared to state averages. The board acknowledged these discrepancies, pointing out that a portion of eighth graders are enrolled in advanced courses, which could skew overall performance data.

Concerns regarding third-grade performance were attributed to potential learning loss from remote education during the early pandemic years. The district has implemented a tiered system of support to address varying student needs, with personalized instruction plans for those requiring additional help.

The board also presented an overview of district goals, emphasizing the importance of continuous improvement in student performance. The implementation of standards-based report cards and formative assessment tools were discussed as steps towards aligning evaluations with educational standards.

The board discussed various initiatives to enhance academic performance, including small group instruction and the use of digital resources. The introduction of the NWEA test in science for grades three through eight is expected to provide additional data to support student growth.

33:30The meeting also celebrated several academic achievements, noting that Lacey Township High School’s SAT results surpassed both state and national averages. This success was attributed to collaborative efforts between students and staff, as well as various programs and interventions implemented by the district. The board highlighted the correlation between high SAT scores and increased scholarship opportunities, emphasizing the financial impact of academic excellence on college tuition savings.

Graduation rates were discussed, with Lacey achieving a 97% rate, a marked improvement from previous years. The board also celebrated the achievements of 28 students who earned associate degrees from Ocean County College before graduating high school.

49:32A dual enrollment program with Fairleigh Dickinson University was also featured, allowing students in Advanced Placement classes to earn university credits. However, the board noted complications arising from students managing multiple transcripts when applying to colleges, an issue they aim to address.

Community concerns were voiced, particularly regarding transportation safety. Bernard Johnson, a community member, raised issues about his daughter’s unsafe walking route to school, advocating for exceptions to state guidelines due to hazardous conditions. The board acknowledged his concerns.

1:05:19In addition to transportation and academic discussions, the board reviewed several policy updates, including cell phone usage and job descriptions for custodial positions. The meeting also touched on naming rights for district facilities, with plans to re-advertise and adjust criteria to attract more bids.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: