Lake Placid Town Council Debates RV and Boat Storage Facility Proposal Amid Zoning Challenges

The Lake Placid Town Council meeting was dominated by discussions on a proposed RV and boat storage facility at 1346 US Highway 27 North. The project, spearheaded by Mr. Manning, encountered several zoning hurdles and aesthetic concerns, as council members and community stakeholders deliberated over the implications of converting existing medical office buildings into storage units. The meeting also touched on updates to the town’s comprehensive plan and a variance request for a six-foot fence on South Main Avenue.

0:00The proposed RV and boat storage facility became a focal point of the meeting, with the discussion spearheaded by Dana Rell, the town’s contracted planner. The project aims to transform three medical office buildings near Town Hall into a storage facility. However, the endeavor faces significant zoning challenges, as the property is currently zoned R3 for multifamily residential use, which does not permit outdoor storage. To proceed, a zoning change to Planned Development (PD) would be required, aligning the project with the Lake Placid Regional Planning District.

The proposed facility’s design and location raised various concerns among council members and community representatives. Mr. Manning highlighted a preference against constructing a frontage road alongside US 27, questioning its necessity for the development. This sentiment was echoed by several council members, who appeared skeptical of the requirement’s relevance. Furthermore, the use of metal buildings in the project sparked debates over aesthetics and security. Manning argued for visibility from the highway.

Tamoka Heights residents, whose properties border the proposed site, voiced concerns about the development’s visual and acoustic implications. In response, Manning expressed a willingness to enhance landscaping plans, including potentially erecting a berm with decorative plants, to address these issues. The placement of fencing around the property was also discussed, balancing security for the storage units with the neighboring properties’ aesthetics and privacy.

34:13Further complicating the proposal are the town’s architectural requirements and the associated costs. Manning lamented an additional $400,000 incurred due to these standards, cautioning that altering regulations for his project might set a precedent, prompting other developers to seek similar variances. This led to a broader debate within the council about the feasibility of strictly adhering to existing regulations when unique property uses are involved.

18:20The discussion extended to the property’s access points. Manning proposed using an existing entrance from HealthWay, equipped with deceleration and acceleration lanes, while sealing off a rear entrance for emergency use only. This plan aims to reduce traffic flow compared to the current levels, with gated access to manage vehicle movement effectively.

34:13While some council members acknowledged the potential economic benefits of the storage facility, others emphasized preserving Lake Placid’s character by limiting such developments within town limits. One member suggested that such facilities would be better suited to county land, given the town’s limited space and focus on maintaining its unique identity.

51:57The meeting also covered updates to Lake Placid’s comprehensive plan, led by Town Administrator Charlotte Rodriguez. The plan involves collaboration with the utilities committee and other stakeholders to address land use planning and regulatory programs. The timeline for making recommendations to the Town Council was a point of contention, with some members advocating for more time to thoroughly analyze each category to avoid hasty conclusions.

1:26:20Additionally, the meeting addressed a variance request for a six-foot fence on South Main Avenue. The proposal, which exceeds the town’s four-foot limit, prompted discussions about light, air, traffic congestion, and public safety impacts. The board recommended conditional approval, stipulating that if a residence were built on the property, the fence would need to comply with existing codes, reverting to a four-foot height.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: