The most pressing topic arose from the Commission’s consideration of the environmental impacts associated with the Rocky Woods development proposals. Commission members agreed on the importance of exploring all alternatives to protect the area’s natural resources, such as vernal pools and wetlands. The members emphasized that they must weigh the balance between development and conservation, particularly given that the 40B proposal includes 200 units in a portion of the land. Although local zoning can be overridden by 40B, compliance with Wetlands and Board of Health regulations remains mandatory. Ensuring that the developments adhere to these environmental laws is a top priority for the Commission.

Brandon Fanu, a consultant who had previously reviewed the plans, was brought into the conversation, and there was a proposal to allocate $2,500 from the Commission’s collected fees to hire him for ongoing environmental impact assessments related to the Rocky Woods project. This assessment would provide the necessary expertise to evaluate the environmental concerns, such as the presence of vernal pools and wetlands. The Commission is considering labeling Fanu as a consultant rather than a peer reviewer, which would clarify the nature of his involvement.

A significant concern during the meeting was the presence of rare species such as the Atlantic White Cedar, with a participant referencing Massachusetts government recommendations against clearing or filling wetlands where this species is present. This concern underscored the need for expert assessments to establish necessary conditions for development while preserving sensitive ecological zones.

The discussion also revealed apprehensions about the potential blasting operations required for development. A resident shared personal experiences with blasting, describing it as “traumatic,” and urged the Commission to consult a geologist to evaluate the risks associated with blasting in such a rocky area, as it could affect both wetlands and human health. This consultation would involve the Board of Health and the Planning Board to address any human health impacts related to the blasting.

Additional topics included the implications of increased housing density on local water treatment capacities. A participant cited a neighboring community that had to increase its water treatment frequency due to rising housing density, emphasizing the need for careful planning and resource management to avoid similar issues in Lakeville.

Another point of discussion was the Commission’s oversight role and the importance of collaboration with other town boards to ensure all necessary approvals are secured before any development proceeds. The Commission reiterated that they have not yet reviewed the additional land associated with the OSRD plan, and any future development would require their oversight. All discussions remain theoretical until a formal Notice of Intent is submitted.

In response to these concerns, the Commission began drafting a memo to the Planning Board, expressing their interest in exploring all options that conserve open space and protect natural resources. The memo will include requests for additional information on drinking water sources for the proposed homes, compliance of the conceptual plan with the Wetlands Act, and considerations for the protection of vernal pools. The Commission aims to ensure that any development plan aligns with the community’s interests and the protection of its natural resources.

Concerns about the project’s timeline were also raised, specifically a 180-day mark for certain approvals. A member expressed confusion about whether this period resets with each delay. The developer has agreed to an extension, but the project has already been nearly a year in progress, raising doubts about its future timeline.