03:52A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to a discussion about the site plan review for a 13,300 square foot building proposed by Lex Development Inc. on Harding Street. The board and representatives from Lex Development, Timothy Hash and Matthew Cody, engaged in a comprehensive dialogue about parking adequacy. The developers acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding tenant usage, which could impact parking needs. While they planned for 16 additional spaces, board members expressed skepticism, citing current parking congestion in neighboring areas. The board urged a condition to ensure that if the building use changes, parking needs remain met. Lex Development was also reminded to submit detailed architectural drawings to prevent discrepancies between approved plans and actual construction. Fire safety was another focal point, with a sweep path analysis for fire trucks required to confirm site viability for emergency access.

40:55The meeting then shifted to ongoing signage issues within residentially zoned neighborhoods. Specific concerns were raised about permanent business signs that linger long after project completion. A notable case involved a landscaping company’s sign obstructing driver sightlines at an intersection on Captain’s Way, raising safety concerns. Resident Cla Le Point articulated the visibility issues, emphasizing the distraction caused by the signs and their oversized dimensions. The board acknowledged the challenges in enforcing signage regulations while balancing the needs of small home-based businesses.

44:06In a related discussion, residents voiced frustration over excessive signage and lighting along Route 105, particularly from a local smoke shop. The proliferation of flags and banners, coupled with intrusive lighting, were highlighted as violations of existing regulations. Residents called for stricter enforcement of the night sky bylaw, which mandates downward-facing lights to minimize light pollution. The board considered notifying the zoning enforcement officer to address these concerns and proposed revisiting sign bylaws to uphold safety and aesthetic standards.

53:47The board’s agenda also included reviewing and refining planning forms B and C, integral to streamlining development proposal submissions. These forms, designed to simplify the application process while ensuring comprehensive information is provided, were approved with minor edits for clarity.

01:03:24Further discussions included updates on the Simmons Hills project, formerly known as Rocky Woods, which is progressing under a 40B comprehensive permit. Despite previous attempts to explore an OSRD option, the developers’ reluctance to perform necessary testing left the project in its current trajectory. The board also prepared for an upcoming joint meeting with various committees, aimed at fostering interdepartmental collaboration.

01:08:19The meeting concluded with the approval of past minutes and motions to advance bylaw amendments concerning site plan reviews and accessory dwelling units to the selectboard for the upcoming town meeting. The board expressed interest in retaining the former town planner as a consultant for special projects until a new hire is made.