The meeting began with a discussion on the architectural design and site plan for a proposed development at Harding Street, which had been the subject of prior scrutiny from board members. The plan involved modifying the site layout from one large building to six smaller structures. Concerns were previously raised about the lack of variation in setbacks, colors, wall planes, and architectural features, such as dormers and porches, which are typically expected to align with existing structures in the area. The board emphasized the need for a visually appealing design, with one member noting the absence of architectural diversity commonly found in the region, such as farmers’ porches. The discussion extended to landscaping and screening, with suggestions to incorporate additional elements to enhance the visibility and aesthetics of the development.

The board also addressed Twin Boys LLC’s proposal for contractor bays at Bedford Street. The main concerns revolved around the site’s entrance slope and its ability to accommodate large vehicles such as 18-wheelers. The engineering team assured the board that the design met the necessary specifications, despite the slope being slightly above the ideal percentage. Further deliberations focused on the appearance of the buildings, with adjustments made to better integrate with the residential character of the area. The board reviewed fire chief responses and zoning bylaw sections pertinent to the project, which was classified as an “as of right” use, negating the need for a special permit.

A significant portion of the meeting centered on the comprehensive development plans for the Windgate residences and Fox Estates. Both projects aimed to address community housing needs through various residential configurations, including independent living, assisted living, and age-restricted cottages. The Windgate project, situated on a 50-acre site, involves the remediation of existing structures and a landfill, the construction of residential and memory care facilities, and extensive landscaping improvements. The Fox Estates proposal includes 68 cottage homes, public amenities like dog parks and a nature trail, and adjustments to the wastewater treatment plant.

Throughout these discussions, the board emphasized compliance with environmental and zoning regulations, addressing concerns about traffic impacts, parking adequacy, and the preservation of historical elements. They also reviewed recommendations from the Conservation Commission for wetland restoration efforts and considered comments from peer reviews, with intentions to refine project details collaboratively.

An ongoing review of planning regulations and zoning changes was discussed, with the board approving a grant to revise and update their rules and regulations. This included coordination with Serpent, a government entity, to integrate these updates with a draft stormwater bylaw. The board also focused on planning goals, including the creation of mixed-use zoning districts, open space preservation, and senior housing development. Efforts to expand affordable housing options were highlighted, with requirements for 40B projects to include affordable units.

The meeting concluded with procedural matters, such as the review of zoning board petitions and the approval of meeting minutes. The board addressed parking challenges faced by Buds Goods, a marijuana facility seeking to expand operations, and agreed to communicate these concerns to the zoning board of appeals. Additionally, the board refrained from commenting on a residential property petition, deferring to the zoning board’s expertise in such cases.