Public comments were dominated by concerns about the southwest study area under the AUR. Beth Loden, a Lakeville resident, questioned the accuracy and completeness of the final report, highlighting discrepancies in the acreage owned by developers and the lack of communication with the United States Fish and Wildlife Services. Loden emphasized the need for greater attention to traffic control on County Road 70 and the inclusion of both the Vermilion and Credit River watersheds in the study. She pointed out the presence of endangered species, such as turtles and rusty patch bumblebees, urging the council to consider habitat protection timelines closely. The rapid growth of Lakeville was another focal point, as Loden highlighted the school district’s potential $250 million bond referendum to address infrastructure needs, warning the council that the infrastructure has yet to keep pace with development.

Echoing Loden’s concerns, fellow resident Bob Ericson criticized the report for overlooking the Soberg Waterfall production area as a significant natural resource. Ericson suggested that the Department of Natural Resources might oppose the proposed grading schedule due to sensitive habitats. Both Loden and Ericson expressed disappointment in what they perceived as the city’s failure to incorporate previous citizen feedback, urging the council to formally acknowledge public input in their records.

Following public comments, the council addressed the parks and recreation quarterly report. The report detailed ongoing construction at Grand Prairie Park, with completion expected soon, and plans for new amenities in East Community Park and Lake Marian Greenway. The city is also advancing its park system master plan, with stakeholder meetings involving youth athletic associations and Dakota County Parks representatives. Notable developments included the replacement of the Dakota Heights hockey rink and seasonal park maintenance activities to prepare for winter.

The meeting also saw an discussion over a $50,000 reassessment abatement related to the removal of a hazardous building. One council member expressed concerns about using taxpayer funds for the reassessment. Despite these objections, the resolution to abate the reassessment passed by a majority vote.

In addition to these discussions, the council reviewed the Kyla Crossing second edition preliminary plat, which includes 18 new single-family lots. The proposed development involved amendments to the land use and zoning map to reclassify the area from medium and high density to low-density residential. The Planning Commission had already recommended approval after addressing community concerns about traffic control and pedestrian safety. During the council meeting, members discussed access points and safety measures, ultimately voting in favor of the preliminary plat and related amendments.

Further, the council conducted a public hearing on the reconstruction project for 214th Street West, a street classified as being in “poor” condition. The project is part of the Capital Improvement Plan and involves significant enhancements to the storm sewer system and pavement. The estimated cost is $577,000, with funding sourced from municipal funds and property owner assessments. The council approved the project resolution, allowing for the preparation of plans and specifications.

The meeting also covered the adoption of a ski fee schedule ordinance, which adjusts various permits, planning, engineering fees, and connection charges. The finance director explained the annual review process for the fee schedule, noting only minor adjustments. Despite opening the floor for public comments, none were received, and the ordinance received unanimous council approval.