At the forefront of the meeting was a discussion about the need to update the town’s stormwater bylaw to better manage illicit discharges and stormwater runoff. This revision aligns with new mandates under the MS4 permit, with the aim of incorporating comprehensive stormwater management strategies, including “nature-based solutions” and “green infrastructure.” The proposed draft bylaw, developed with input from Environmental Partners, seeks to ensure that all stormwater management practices adhere to the latest state recommendations.

A central issue was determining the appropriate authority for enforcing the bylaw. The town planner suggested that the stormwater authority should oversee enforcement, leading to a debate about whether this responsibility should fall to the Select Board or other entities such as the Conservation Commission or Planning Board. Historically, Massachusetts General Law permits the Select Board to serve as the stormwater authority, a stance supported by the Building Commissioner. The proposed draft reinforces this by recommending the Select Board as the designated authority, with the Building Commissioner acting as the enforcement agent.

Concerns about potential oversight in stormwater management were raised, particularly with projects that bypass review by boards like the Planning Board or Conservation Commission. The proposed bylaw introduces a permitting structure to ensure compliance with stormwater regulations. The discussion also touched on a peer review process funded through a 53G account, which would alleviate the burden on town staff by having developers fund the review of their stormwater plans.

The meeting also saw discussions on a proposed monument to commemorate John Sassamon, a historical figure with a complex legacy tied to Lakeville’s past. The proposal, presented by a participant named Daniel Ceri, intends to honor Sassamon’s role in the events leading up to King Philip’s War. The debate reflected on previous attempts to recognize Sassamon, which faced resistance due to differing historical interpretations. Discussions highlighted the sensitivity surrounding the commemoration, with suggestions to broaden the acknowledgment to encompass the wider Native American community. The board expressed a commitment to ensuring community engagement and inclusivity in the project, acknowledging the potential for controversy but recognizing the importance of historical reflection.

The meeting also addressed a proposed cleanup of a Brownfield site, initiated by Rhino Capital. The board scrutinized the implications of holding care and custody of the land, which might obligate the town for future liabilities. Representatives from Rhino Capital clarified that their intention was to retain ownership of the land, with the town holding an exclusive easement for cleanup purposes. The board expressed cautious support, contingent on ensuring that the town would not incur any liabilities.

The potential for funding the cleanup project as a “priority project” through MassDevelopment was also discussed. The board deliberated on the requirements for submitting an expression of interest to assess the project’s viability, emphasizing that this step was non-binding but necessary for feedback from the state. The dialogue also touched on concerns about future funding opportunities for Lakeville, with apprehensions that state allocations for this project could impact eligibility for other grants.

Further discussions revolved around the town’s administrative structure, with proposals to restructure roles to better support the Town Administrator. The introduction of a new position, potentially titled “Administrative Specialist,” prompted discussions about the appropriate title and salary range to attract qualified candidates. The board acknowledged the urgency of filling this role to maintain continuity, especially in light of an impending staff departure.