Lakeville Select Board Faces Community Backlash Over Roadway Alterations Affecting Local Businesses

In a recent Lakeville Select Board meeting, the community voiced concerns over proposed roadway alterations, particularly the impact on local businesses and the safety of residents. The alterations, funded by a $20 million grant from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, include widening roads, constructing sidewalks, and adding pedestrian curb ramps, but have sparked debate on their implications for local operations and resident property rights.

01:58The meeting began with a public hearing focused on layout alterations for several roadways. Michael Russo, representing Russo’s RV on Bedford Street, was one of the first to address the board, emphasizing the challenges the project posed to their business. He highlighted the substantial loss of usable space, approximately 30 feet, necessary for maneuvering trailers, which could severely impact operations at Russo’s RV. The Russo family expressed concerns about the removal and stacking of an existing fence and the need for a new curb cut on Route 79 to mitigate these impacts.

16:32The discussion revealed the complexities businesses face in balancing their operational needs with the proposed improvements. Michael Russo emphasized the importance of maintaining safety, particularly the necessity of replacing a light pole crucial for intersection safety. He stressed the significance of lighting, stating, “I would think you’d want that lit up at night so somebody doesn’t get hit,” underlining potential risks associated with reduced visibility in the area.

As the meeting progressed, other residents echoed concerns about the impact of the project on their properties. Sheila Russo elaborated on the logistical challenges the alterations posed to deliveries and operations at Russo’s RV Center. She noted the increased difficulty in maneuvering trailers due to potential space reductions, stating, “to swing that in is very difficult the way it is now.” Her comments emphasized the broader implications of the project on local businesses and their operations.

17:59Christopher King, a resident of 70 Clear Pond Road, raised issues regarding property ownership related to the project. He presented discrepancies in property layout dating back to 1987 and requested that the board consider this information in future discussions. Meanwhile, Donna Katano, a long-term resident near the project area, expressed frustrations over the responsibility of maintaining a 600-foot sidewalk stretch and historical water drainage issues on her property. She questioned the adequacy of communication from the town and emphasized the safety of the intersection as a critical concern.

The proposed infrastructure changes also led to discussions on property rights and the adequacy of communication from the town. Residents articulated their apprehensions.

40:47During the public hearing on the Route 79 project, residents continued to express concerns about the impact of road improvements on their properties. One resident criticized state tree trimming practices and the limitations posed by state design standards. Another resident, worried about the viability of a buildable house lot they owned, sought clarification on the town’s acquisition of property for the project. They were particularly concerned about the potential impact on their well’s water quality due to drainage alterations.

38:56Assurance was given that no traffic signal equipment would be placed on private property, alleviating some concerns.

The meeting concluded with a motion to close the public hearing, followed by the ratification of an employment agreement for Police Chief Matthew Perkins. The board also revisited a motion to confirm the layout of Harrison A Avenue.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: