0:01The city council’s decision to authorize an investigation into the leak of the Maverick report was a central topic, reflecting deep concerns about the handling of sensitive information. The report, which had been made available online, contained unredacted details that led to discomfort within the police department. A council member questioned the City attorney about the leak’s circumstances, prompting a motion to investigate how it occurred. This motion stirred debate among council members, with some arguing that the investigation should focus on the contents of the report rather than the leak. Ultimately, the motion passed, authorizing the City attorney to engage an external party to conduct the investigation.

The council then shifted its focus to the contents of the Maverick and Benet reports, which included allegations against former Chief William Castro. The POST Commission had addressed concerns regarding a procedural misstep by Lieutenant Paul Rossi, determining no factual or legal basis for the Maverick report’s findings against him. Representatives from Maverick Investigative Services were present to explain their investigation process, emphasizing that no collusion was found that might have compromised the Benet investigation.

19:18The investigation into Chief Castro was a point of contention, with discussions highlighting various allegations, including his conduct during a high-speed pursuit and claims of officer intimidation. The investigator tasked with the case confirmed that while Castro’s absence from the interview process was noted, the investigation proceeded based on available evidence such as video footage and dispatch calls. Despite difficulties in coordinating interviews with Castro, the investigator maintained confidence in the findings, which recommended a 90-day suspension for Castro due to his involvement in the chase and alleged dishonesty in a police report.

Further deliberations revealed concerns about the communication breakdowns within the city’s administrative processes. The council criticized the mayor’s office for acting as a gatekeeper of information, particularly regarding reports related to police conduct. One council member noted that Castro continued to participate in city budget meetings during his suspension, which influenced the recommendation for his termination.

1:52:22The investigation’s integrity and the city’s response were scrutinized, with Sergeant Mike Samar expressing dissatisfaction with the handling of Castro’s case. He emphasized the importance of appointing a qualified police chief and lamented the lack of transparency and accountability within the city’s leadership.