The debate over the city’s procurement process for real estate services took center stage, as commissioners scrutinized the choice of firms located outside Leesburg. Concerns were raised about the selection of three top-ranked firms for real estate broker services, two from Orlando and one from Fort Lauderdale. The discussion revealed a divide among commissioners about the importance of prioritizing local expertise versus seeking the best value. One commissioner argued for local engagement, emphasizing that local firms possess a better understanding of the area and potential renters.

Questions about the evaluation committee’s process arose, particularly around whether the chosen firms would be the exclusive options for future real estate needs. It was clarified that while the city does not typically require a realtor for surplus lots, the engagement of real estate professionals would be considered for complex transactions.

Another topic was the proposal to rezone and annex a 7.53-acre parcel near Royal Highlands for a residential development of 49 townhomes. The proposal sparked a discussion among residents and commissioners, with strong opposition from Royal Highlands residents who anticipated commercial development in the area. Concerns centered on potential traffic increases, safety risks, and the compatibility of the development with existing community character. Residents like Mary Hitchcock and Debbie Orchuk voiced fears about increased traffic and unauthorized access from the new development into Royal Highlands, highlighting potential privacy and security issues.

The developer presented the project as a residential community for those aged 55 and older, featuring amenities like a pickleball court and dog park, and asserted that the development would generate less traffic than a commercial build-out. Despite these assurances, residents remained skeptical, citing the impact on property values and community character. The commission decided to postpone a decision, seeking further clarification on access rights and infrastructure implications.

In other matters, the commission approved ordinances amending the city’s pension funds for police officers and firefighters, noting the extensive workshops and discussions held prior to the meeting. Additionally, the commission introduced ordinances for annexing a property for townhome development, with public feedback highlighting concerns about traffic, density, and environmental impacts.

The commission also received updates on the Venice at Lake Harris development, which is undergoing a special magistrate process following the denial of their annexation request. The city attorney outlined the challenges in scheduling hearings and expressed confidence in the special magistrate’s qualifications.

In discussions about procedural changes, a commissioner proposed transitioning to a special magistrate process for planning and zoning. This proposal prompted concerns about the potential loss of community input, with commissioners acknowledging the need to balance legal efficiency with local representation.