The meeting’s focus swiftly moved to the resolution to terminate Menor’s contract, sparking an intensive discussion regarding the authority and decision-making process of the city manager’s role. Concerns were raised about a particular decision made by Menor to change a position for another employee, which a letter from a commissioner criticized for its pace, manner, and the lack of legal counsel. The commissioner’s letter also emphasized the need for transparency and communication, aligning decisions with the interests of constituents.

These supporters pointed to his successful management of the city’s utilities and maintaining a low tax rate. In contrast, others expressed concerns over the termination of Chief Hicks and the process that led to it, calling for respect, thorough consideration, and transparency in handling such matters.

The debate over the city manager’s authority and whether he overstepped his boundaries by appointing a deputy city manager without advertising the position was a central point of contention. Although some commissioners supported Menor’s track record and positive impact on the city, disagreement surfaced over the transparency of his decision-making process. The legal ramifications and the need for clarity in the qualifications for city staff positions also came under scrutiny.

Menor defended his decision to appoint the deputy city manager, asserting that it fell within his authority and served the city’s best interests. However, the commission ultimately decided to terminate his contract without cause, resulting in a resolution that included severance payment per his employment agreement.

Public commentary on the issue was polarized, with some residents and speakers at the meeting expressing staunch support for Menor, lauding his assistance to citizens in need, fiscal responsibility, and transformative impact on Leesburg. They urged the commission to resolve differences and maintain Menor’s leadership, warning against the potential disruption a new city manager could cause. One speaker, citing extensive managerial experience, underscored the importance of trust in a manager and vouched for Menor’s trustworthiness.

On the other hand, some expressed their dissatisfaction with Menor, arguing that the potential removal was a personal issue and urging the commission to represent the interests of their constituents more closely. The impact of the termination on the upcoming budget process and the impending commissioner elections was also a concern.

Amidst these discussions, the commission agreed to hold a special meeting to openly deliberate on how to move forward as a cohesive team. The commission also tackled the city manager evaluation process, with a proposal for a new evaluation form and a debate over whether to include city employees’ input. The commission voted against including employees in the manager’s evaluation but agreed to survey general employee sentiment about the organization separately.

In other meeting matters, the commission addressed franchise agreements for the Villages of Westlake and the establishment of the Grace Key Groves Community Development District. These items were introduced and tabled for future discussion, with the second reading of the ordinance for the development district scheduled for May 28, 2024.

The meeting concluded with an acknowledgment of the challenges faced by the commission and appreciation for the decision to retain the city manager. Mayor Jimmy B welcomed Deputy City Manager Hicks, noting an oversight in not mentioning him earlier in the meeting. The commission then moved to adjourn, with the motion approved.