Leesburg Residents Voice Concerns Over Lake Bright Brighthurst Development at Planning Meeting
- Meeting Overview:
The Leesburg Planning and Zoning Board’s recent meeting saw significant public turnout as residents voiced concerns over the proposed Lake Bright Brighthurst development, a large-scale project entailing the annexation and development of approximately 202 acres for 502 single-family homes. The proposal, which aims to change the future land use designation and rezone the land, has sparked debate over its potential impact on traffic, community safety, and local infrastructure.
The most contentious topic of the meeting was the proposed Lake Bright Brighthurst development, which includes plans for 502 single-family dwelling units. Residents expressed concerns about the impact on local traffic and safety. The development, situated south of Desert Lane and near County Road 33, is expected to generate 4,317 new daily trips, with substantial peak hour traffic. Concerns were raised about the adequacy of existing infrastructure to accommodate this increase. One resident highlighted the difficulty of navigating Desert Lane with trailers, while another pointed out the inadequacy of the proposed traffic solutions given the project’s scale.
The proposal includes a plan amendment and rezoning from Lake County Rural to City of Leesburg Estate Residential and from Lake County Agriculture to Planned Unit Development. The development aims to maintain a rural aesthetic with specific architectural standards and a requirement for 35% open space. However, the density of the proposed housing has been a point of contention, with some residents arguing that it would disrupt the local ecosystem and alter the area’s character.
Public feedback was robust, with written comments and testimonies indicating concerns about the impact on wildlife and the area’s peaceful character. Residents called for larger buffers and solid walls to maintain privacy and reduce noise. One resident questioned the continuous development in the area, expressing frustration with the phrase, “When will enough be enough?”
The development agreement outlines requirements for split rail fencing along County Road 33, a comprehensive landscaping plan, and a 25-foot wide buffer with plantings around the property. Despite these measures, residents remain skeptical about the project’s impact on their community. There were calls for the developer to consider larger lot sizes, with one resident suggesting that the current five-acre minimum per residence would be more suitable.
The board discussed the developer’s responsibility to initiate construction of roadway improvements, particularly at the intersection of County Road 33, as part of a prior agreement with Lake County. This agreement includes a $2.3 million project to enhance intersections, which must be completed before any units are occupied.
During the meeting, public comments were focused on the potential traffic congestion and safety risks. One resident shared a personal account of a near head-on collision, emphasizing the need for turn lanes and improved road safety. Concerns were also raised about the adequacy of healthcare infrastructure to support the anticipated population growth. A nurse practitioner questioned the ability to provide timely emergency services given the expected traffic congestion.
The board also addressed the proposed Cronin Dewey Robbins Residential project, another development under consideration. This project involves 26 single-family dwelling units on 9.2 acres. Residents expressed opposition, citing the desire to maintain the area’s wildlife and tranquility. The planning and zoning department recommended approval of the project, citing compatibility with surrounding land uses and alignment with the city’s comprehensive plan goals. However, public opposition was strong, with residents advocating for larger lot sizes and expressing concerns about the density of the proposed homes.
In the Whispering Hills area, a proposed development of 26 single-family units also faced scrutiny. Concerns were raised about traffic impact and the proximity of a shooting range. Residents feared that the new development could disrupt the rural character of the area and lead to conflicts with existing land uses. The board ultimately decided to deny the proposal, influenced by public comments and the potential impact on the community.
Jimmy Burry
Planning Board, Zoning Board Officials:
Tim Sennett, Nathaniel Sanders, Ted Bowersox, Frazier J. Marshall, John O’Kelley, Stewart Kaplan, Ze’Shieca Carter, Ken Simeone (Alternate), Darin Akkerman (Alternate), Dan Miller (Director), Kandi Harper (Deputy Director), Sabrina Mitchell (Administrative Executive Assistant I), Christine Rock (Senior Planner), Dianne Yekel (Senior Planner), Melissa Medders De Los Santos (Planner), Max Van Allen (Planner)
-
Meeting Type:
Planning Board, Zoning Board
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
01/22/2026
-
Recording Published:
01/22/2026
-
Duration:
126 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Florida
-
County:
Lake County
-
Towns:
Leesburg
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 03/03/2026
- 03/03/2026
- 388 Minutes
- 03/03/2026
- 03/04/2026
- 108 Minutes
- 03/03/2026
- 03/03/2026
- 11 Minutes