Long underscored the committee’s task of reviewing the charter, which acts as the county’s “home rule constitution,” and highlighted its responsibility to reflect community needs adequately. The committee, composed of diverse professionals and community leaders, was reminded of its broad latitude in reviewing the charter, with the exception of specific issues pre-identified by the board. The members were informed they had 120 days to complete their review, guided by a support team including Ken Morris and Nikki Hatch, among others.

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to understanding the structure and function of constitutional officers in Leon County. Florida’s unique system, where the supervisor of elections is an elected position, was highlighted. Historical anecdotes were shared, emphasizing the evolution of governance and the criteria for electing officials. The process for amending the county charter was detailed, explaining that changes can only be made through a public vote, initiated by citizen petitions, county commission votes, or the charter review committee.

The discussion extended to past charter review efforts, noting the mixed outcomes of proposals advanced in 2010 and 2018. The 2010 committee successfully placed several amendments on the ballot, with most passing, while only one of two proposals in 2018 was approved. The significance of community support for any proposed amendments was stressed, with a reminder that not all issues require charter changes and can often be addressed through policies or ordinances.

Compliance with Florida’s Sunshine Law was a focal point, with County Attorney Chassity Ostein providing an in-depth overview. Ostein emphasized the law’s role in ensuring public access to governmental meetings and preventing closed-door discussions. She outlined the requirements for reasonable notice, public accessibility, and the recording of written minutes. The potential consequences of Sunshine Law violations were discussed, distinguishing between knowing and inadvertent breaches, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment.

The complexities of maintaining compliance were illustrated through hypothetical scenarios. Ostein cautioned against one-way communications that could unintentionally lead to breaches and urged members to consult her for clarification. The discussion also covered public records law and the code of ethics, detailing the legal obligations of council members and the importance of transparency in their official conduct.

The meeting proceeded with the election of Maryanne Lindley as the chair of the charter review committee, recognized for her extensive experience. Chanty Haynes was elected vice chair. The committee’s schedule was outlined, with nine meetings planned, culminating in public hearings anticipated for the summer.