The formation of the Charter Committee was a central topic, with a surprising number of applicants exceeding the board’s expectations for a seven to nine-member team. The applicants presented a diverse array of backgrounds and expertise. Among the candidates, Alan McRae stood out with his extensive involvement in local committees, including the Finance Committee and Personnel Board, and his background in public works. His willingness to serve, even if not selected, highlighted the community’s dedication to participatory governance.

Betsy Bowling shared her experience in business accounting and her history with the Finance Committee, emphasizing her desire to help Littleton meet its residents’ evolving needs. Another applicant, Charlotte, a more recent resident, brought a unique perspective with a background in global public health and sustainability, signaling the inclusion of fresh ideas in the committee’s discussions. Her enthusiasm for sustainability resonated with Matthew, who inquired further into her focus.

The dialogue around the committee’s composition involved a discussion on whether to include a select board member within the group. Opinions varied, with some advocating for the inclusion of a board member to provide valuable institutional knowledge, while others argued for an independent structure to encourage unbiased deliberations. The possibility of expanding the committee to nine members was also considered, acknowledging the talented pool of applicants and the benefits of having a larger group to ensure quorum and diverse representation.

As the board navigated the selection process, there was a push for transparency and fairness. The idea of an anonymous voting process was proposed to avoid any perception of favoritism, likened humorously by one participant to being “like getting picked for the basketball team.” This approach aimed to respect all applicants’ willingness to serve while ensuring a selection process that garnered broad support.

The meeting also covered logistical aspects, such as ensuring adequate representation and participation. A model where a select board member and an alternate could serve as liaisons was suggested to maintain continuity and engagement, albeit with some concerns about the practicality of consistent attendance given the committee’s proposed bi-monthly meetings.

Finally, the board resolved the appointment process, with unanimous approval for specific individuals to join the Charter Committee. It was decided that the committee would determine its own leadership roles, with initial organizational support from the Callin Center, which would help facilitate the first meeting. This session would address topics such as the open meeting law and the charter’s framework.