The rehabilitation of Frog Pond was a point of discussion. Yanley detailed how a recent study revealed the presence of 3 to 23 inches of sediment buildup, necessitating extensive maintenance. The project aims to remove 99 cubic yards of sediment using a small excavator and manage invasive species. Jean Christie and Maria Johnsonburgh from the design team outlined plans to work primarily within the 50-foot no-disturb buffer zone. They emphasized the necessity of a bypass system to manage water during sediment removal.

Questions from commission members focused on the logistics of sediment management. The team explained that the sediment would be temporarily stockpiled in a lined area with erosion controls before being transported for disposal. Concerns were raised about the definition of “temporary” regarding the stockpile duration, with no specific time frame established but a collective agreement to address the matter. The commission also discussed the potential impact of wet weather on the project, emphasizing the need to halt work if conditions worsened. The use of plastic liners to mitigate water drainage was considered, though total dryness was acknowledged as unachievable.

The commission addressed several compliance issues in ongoing projects, notably the enforcement order on Sarah Indian Way, where unauthorized work had been reported. The property owner was absent but had communicated plans to attend the next meeting. The enforcement order was ratified, highlighting concerns over unauthorized clearing and installation of sonotubes beyond approved plans. The commission underscored the need for compliance and future discussion once the property owner could attend.

Another compliance discussion involved a project concerning a path and bench installation adjacent to a water body. The applicant sought clarification on the use of mechanical equipment and vegetation removal, sparking debate over the interpretation of the order of conditions. The commission highlighted discrepancies between the approved plans and completed work, particularly soil disturbance. They stressed the need for a comprehensive restoration plan to prevent sediment from entering the pond. The applicant agreed to comply, acknowledging the requirement for a more examination of water flow interaction with the path.

Additionally, the meeting addressed a proposed septic system installation on Pleasant Street. The representative presented plans to replace a failing septic tank and leech field within a 100-foot buffer zone from wetlands. The commission raised questions about the removal process. Concerns over vegetation impact and equipment necessary for the project were also discussed. The representative admitted to not having visited the site, leading to suggestions for a plans specifying tree preservation.

The commission also reviewed a project on Madawanaki Trail, where a resident proposed patio and stair repairs. The resident explained the need to replace deteriorating bricks with granite and address a sinkhole. The commission noted the requirement for a notice of intent due to the project’s proximity to wetlands, with concerns over the lack of a waiver for work within 50 feet of water. They emphasized the importance of documenting all aspects of the work on a formal plan and the necessity of photographs and a site walk for better understanding.