56:37The most notable topic of the meeting was the ongoing deliberation over a wetland crossing proposal that has been under consideration for several years. The proposal includes a narrow crossing to access two lots, potential boardwalks, and modifications to open space aimed at resolving litigation issues. Commission members expressed differing views on whether to request an alternative analysis before the next meeting. Some members suggested that withdrawing the current plan and submitting a new proposal might simplify matters, while others emphasized the importance of engaging in meaningful discussions about the existing filing. Ultimately, the commission decided to continue the conversation at the next meeting, allowing the applicant time to gather additional information.

19:03Discussion also centered around the restoration project on Powers Road, where erosion control and revegetation plans were reviewed. Visual aids, including historical photographs, were presented to clarify the condition of the driveway and surrounding areas before any work was undertaken. The commission reached a consensus that the existing conditions plan was satisfactory and agreed on the need for a comprehensive restoration plan. Specific concerns included the removal of objectionable fill, which consists of various materials such as concrete and asphalt, and the importance of not disturbing the ecological balance during the removal process. A detailed restoration plan with a schedule for work and inspections was requested, incorporating feedback and suggestions from commission members.

37:25The commission also reviewed planting plans related to the restoration project, with inquiries about the types of berry bushes and trees to be included. Specific recommendations for plant selections and control measures were discussed. The timeline for the restoration plan’s approval was set for mid-February to allow planning for early spring vegetation growth. Collaboration with an expert was encouraged to ensure the success of the project.

Another agenda item was ongoing litigation related to a project filed in 2019. Updates were provided on the status of permits and appeals involving a 17-lot subdivision with a wetland crossing. The project had evolved into a seven-lot Approval Not Required (ANR) plan, recently approved by the planning board. The commission acknowledged the need for re-notification of the public due to the extensive time elapsed since the last meeting and changes in project parameters, emphasizing the importance of public engagement and input.

56:37Administrative items discussed included standardizing application processes and documentation filing checklists. The inclusion of an arborist report as a specific requirement was proposed. However, the consensus was to defer these discussions to the next meeting to avoid redundancy.

Additionally, the commission addressed a proposal for an owl prowl event by the Littleton Conservation Trust, which would involve the use of conservation land after hours. There was some disagreement about whether a land use permit was necessary for the event. Some members argued for the need to have documentation in place to avoid potential issues with law enforcement, while others questioned the necessity of a permit for a simple nighttime walk on trails. A decision was made to seek further details from the trust.

Legislative updates were also reviewed, noting the expiration of current legislation allowing virtual meetings on March 31, with speculation about whether virtual and hybrid meetings would become permanent. Discussions touched on the potential shift back to in-person meetings in April.