One notable issue addressed was the situation involving illegal docks on Lakeshore Drive parcel U12-14-Z. The commission discussed the urgency of resolving violations of the Wetlands Protection Act related to these docks. There was a proposal to hold a joint meeting with the select board and parks and recreation on September 8 or September 23 to devise a cohesive strategy. The urgency was highlighted by a suggestion from one participant to remove the docks in violation quickly, emphasizing, “it’d be better to move as quickly as we can without being inconsiderate just as people do leave for the winter.” However, there were differing opinions on the pace of action, with some advocating for comprehensive community engagement before making any decisions. This disagreement underscored the challenge of balancing rapid action with thorough public consultation.

Discussion also revolved around the need for consistency in dock policies across town properties. Questions were raised about how to handle unpermitted docks, especially when the town’s parks and recreation department had a permitted dock on the same parcel. Legal considerations were examined, with a title check confirming no easements would complicate dock decisions. The commission recognized the need for alignment with other town departments to prevent miscommunication and potential backlash from community members.

In another discussion, the commission examined environmental concerns regarding the use of a chemical, NOVec 1230, for fire suppression at 97 and Mil Road. The chemical’s ecotoxicological effects raised alarms, particularly in a sensitive watershed area. One member questioned the wisdom of using such a chemical, advocating for non-ecotoxic alternatives. A representative from the light and water department clarified that while no immediate changes were planned, alternative chemicals were being considered. Despite assurances that the chemical was safe, concerns lingered about its environmental impact. The commission decided to continue deliberating on this issue in their next meeting, emphasizing the need to explore alternative chemicals or improved storage strategies before proceeding with the project.

The meeting also delved into the logistics of sediment management for a project reviewing two design options. A site walk had been conducted to evaluate these options, with concerns about the proximity of sediment storage to a wetland buffer. Option B, which suggested relocating sediment storage to a town-owned parcel, was favored due to better access and environmental considerations. However, questions about water management during sediment processing were raised. The proposed use of a pumping bypass system with a coffer dam and dewatering bags was scrutinized for adequacy. Concerns about potential runoff during heavy rainfall prompted suggestions for a more controlled approach, such as using a frack tank for better water management.

Further discussions explored the restoration of sites post-project, stressing the need for clear documentation of restoration requirements to ensure compliance. Concerns about potential neighborhood disruption due to sediment stockpile location were also noted. Ultimately, the commission recognized the need for further deliberation to address all environmental concerns adequately before proceeding.

In addition to these major topics, the commission touched on updates regarding ongoing projects, including the restoration efforts on Powers, which were proceeding with temporary stabilization measures. The conversation also included administrative updates about fire road maintenance at Oak Hill and concerns about hornet nests along trails, which had led to temporary trail closures.

Finally, the commission addressed procedural matters, including the scheduling of a public hearing for a notice of intent on Hadelon Road and the need for a special meeting to ensure ample time for public input on various issues. The meeting concluded with unanimous approval to move forward with a project on the frog pond property, incorporating conditions discussed for water management during sediment drying.