The Clean Lakes project, a environmental and financial undertaking for Littleton, took center stage as committee members grappled with finding a stable source of funding. Concerns were raised about the town’s ability to sustain contributions from CPA funds, which are generally reserved for the acquisition, creation, and preservation of open space, and the support of community housing and historic resources. The conversation highlighted the need for alternative funding sources, possibly through grants or partnerships, to ensure the longevity of the project.

The allocation of funds was another focal point, with discussions about the current system managed by the water department. Some members expressed a desire to revisit the previous method of fund allocation. This topic segued into the broader issue of potential legislative action, though specifics were not detailed in the summary provided.

Moving on to the topic of local infrastructure, the committee addressed the repairs on Robinson Road. The project appeared to be progressing positively, with members giving favorable feedback. The repair efforts included the reinstallation of a roof on the barn, which was briefly discussed. Further discussions touched upon the Frog Pond repair and invasive plant control, with a suggestion to bring this matter to the springtime meeting due to existing time constraints.

The fiscal year 2025 budget was also on the agenda, along with the adoption of a Code of Conduct and revisions to the preservation plan. Members contributed input and suggestions, engaging in debate over specific sections and the language used in the documents.

In a parallel discussion, the Littleton Community Planning Commission tackled the community preservation plan, emphasizing the need to clarify the town’s savings and spending strategy. There was a conversation about integrating a 2016 savings and spending policy into the plan and updating the open space and recreation plans to reflect current practices. The application process timeline was debated, particularly the feasibility of enforcing a strict submission deadline for projects, with some concern over the possibility of last-minute submissions.

The commission also discussed the upcoming deadline for warrant closure and the importance of proactive public communication regarding future projects. Deliberations included methods to improve the dissemination of information and the potential shift to electronic distribution of documents to reduce printing. The topic of historical preservation projects emerged, alongside the desire to create more walking and biking paths in the community, particularly to enhance the safety of children.