The meeting began with a discussion on the impact of Governor Healey’s new legislation concerning affordable housing and its potential effects on local bylaws. The board was particularly interested in how these changes could influence zoning practices in Littleton. Members expressed a strong desire to ensure community interests are represented while adhering to new state requirements. The conversation underscored the board’s historical role in understanding and influencing zoning bylaws, despite not having the authority to draft or pass them.

A substantial portion of the meeting was devoted to discussing ADUs, which have become an increasingly relevant topic in light of the new legislation. Board members debated the merits and challenges of allowing ADUs in both single-family and multi-family contexts. One member proposed modifications to existing regulations to permit ADUs in multi-family properties. However, concerns were raised about the potential transformation of a two-family residence into a three-family structure, which could impact traffic and noise levels in neighborhoods.

The board deliberated on the aesthetic and functional implications of ADUs, particularly in maintaining the historic character of Littleton. There were discussions on the need for bylaws that ensure ADUs complement primary dwellings in design and are strategically placed to avoid compromising neighborhood aesthetics. The board was keen on involving the community in discussions about such developments, recognizing the importance of neighbor input, especially when new ADUs are proposed.

Another topic of concern was the Planning Board’s authority to grant waivers, which some members felt could inadvertently bypass town decisions, particularly concerning low-income housing projects like the Hager project. The board discussed the possibility of proposing a zoning bylaw change at the town meeting to limit the Planning Board’s ability to grant certain waivers. The conversation highlighted a tension between the two boards, with the Zoning Board expressing a desire for a more significant role in reviewing projects to ensure thorough consideration of site plans and community impact.

In addition to ADUs, the board addressed legislative changes related to the merging of undersized lots. The new law allows non-conforming lots to remain distinct and developable under certain criteria, provided they meet specific size and frontage requirements. Board members expressed skepticism about the feasibility of constructing homes within the size limits set by the legislation, given existing septic regulations.

The meeting concluded with a call for collaborative discussions with the Planning Board, emphasizing the importance of maintaining authority over variance and special permit processes. The board agreed on the necessity of engaging in joint meetings with the planning board to address upcoming zoning law changes and to ensure that neighbor input is considered in zoning decisions.