59:38The most notable discussion centered on the proposal for a deck expansion on Carne Terrace, which required three variances concerning area, height, and rear yard setback. The architect explained that the existing deck was already elevated at 9 to 10 feet, which had created a unique hardship due to the property’s topography. The proposed expansion aimed to enhance the deck’s functionality, allowing for more extensive outdoor activities. During the proceedings, a public participant raised concerns about privacy, particularly regarding the potential for increased visibility into their backyard, noting that foliage provided some privacy but diminished in winter. Addressing these concerns, the board considered conditions to minimize light spillage from the deck, ultimately deciding to require downward-facing lighting as a compromise. Despite the apprehensions, the board approved the expansion with this lighting condition.

23:22Earlier in the meeting, the board reviewed an application for a side yard variance for a garage addition on Falcon Court. The architect described the current garage as too small, humorously noting, “unless you have a Mini Cooper, you can’t open the door without hitting the wall.” The requested variance would reduce the setback from the required ten feet to seven feet ten inches. The board found the testimony persuasive and approved the variance unanimously.

43:21Another application that drew attention was the proposal to construct a new single-family house on Ver Terrace. The project, submitted by Leang Zang and G J Guna Tang, involved replacing an existing 1,700-square-foot house with a new two-story, 3,489-square-foot residence. While the design stayed within the allowable floor area ratio, it exceeded the habitable floor area limit by 269 square feet. Board members expressed concerns about the house’s size relative to others on the block, questioning the absence of a demonstrated hardship. The architect argued for the design’s compatibility with the neighborhood, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal and compliance with broader zoning intent. The board eventually approved the application, noting its reduced size from an earlier proposal and the agreement to limit attic use.

49:38The board also addressed a variance request for an addition on Waywood Road, where Mr. Gandhi sought to expand his home due to growing family needs and the shift to remote work. The proposal included expanding both the first and second floors, staying just under the maximum habitable floor area ratio. Mr. Gandhi highlighted the necessity of the expansion for family privacy and work-from-home arrangements. The board approved the request after clarifying the use of attached and detached garages and confirming that the proposal would not exceed zoning limits.