The proposal for a new single-family residence on Blackstone Drive by applicant Sajimon Anthony was a focal point of the meeting. Anthony, along with his architect Yuval Wellish and engineer William Scott, sought a variance due to the property’s undersized lot, measuring 23,992 square feet instead of the required 25,000 square feet for the R2 zoning designation. The design, described as a modern colonial structure with six bedrooms, required an increase in habitable floor area from the allowed 4,870 to 5,129 square feet. Despite the challenges presented by the lot’s dimensions, board members expressed favorable opinions about the design, with one member commenting positively on the integration of the house within the neighborhood context. The application was warmly received, leading to unanimous approval after clarification on the impact of the additional square footage, which arose primarily from an attic space over the garage.

Simultaneously, the board deliberated on a application for a proposed residence on Arthur Terrace. The proposal, presented by the law firm Sils and Gross, involved variances for a front yard setback and habitable floor area. The applicant’s representative, Matthew Patad, emphasized the lot’s oversized nature compared to surrounding parcels. Architect Jose Carbio outlined the proposed two-story home, noting constraints due to the lot’s shape. The design included four bedrooms on the upper level, with additional bedrooms on the first floor and basement. Concerns were raised about the proposed size relative to the neighborhood, with board members questioning whether the variance requests aligned with community standards. Despite these concerns, the board considered the proposal’s adherence to a 27% floor area ratio, ultimately granting the requested variances.

In another discussion, the board considered Felix Flores and Rachel Mandi’s application for an addition to a 1930s bungalow on Barnett Street. Represented by architect Anna Sanchez, they sought approval for variances related to front yard setbacks and garage side yard setbacks. The proposed expansion aimed to add two bedrooms, a bathroom, and a screened-in porch, addressing the family’s need for more living space. The board examined the implications of the variances, including a reduced front yard setback to 18.63 feet from the required 40 feet, and a garage setback of 2.31 feet instead of the 5 feet required. A board member questioned the accuracy of the referenced zoning code. Despite the need for variances, the board recognized the proposal’s alignment with the existing structure’s character and the family’s needs.

The meeting also included a proposal for a property on Walnut Street, involving a detached garage and home addition. The applicant aimed to elevate the second floor to accommodate adult children living at home, with variances needed due to existing non-conforming conditions. Concerns about emergency vehicle access due to the lot’s narrowness were discussed, but the board ultimately supported the proposal, acknowledging the property’s suitability within the neighborhood context.