0:00One of the most notable discussions revolved around an application for a property at Three Hearthstone Terrace. The applicant sought approval for a first and second-floor addition that required variances for both habitable floor area and habitable floor area ratio. The proposed modifications involved expanding the allowable living space from 4,870 square feet to 5,954 square feet, necessitating a variance of 1,084 square feet. The habitable floor area ratio was proposed to increase from 18% to 23.4%, a variance of 5.4%. The applicant’s representative argued that the variances were minor and consistent with the neighborhood’s character. However, concerns about the massing and visual impact of the proposed expansion were raised, with some members questioning the necessity of such an increase in living space.

The architectural design intended to modernize the existing split-level home and improve its functionality while maintaining the neighborhood’s architectural style. Expert testimony from architect William Gentile supported the applicant’s case, noting that the proposed improvements did not encroach on setbacks or other bulk standards. Despite this, the board expressed concerns about the overall massing and size of the structure.

54:40Another noteworthy application involved the conversion of a second-floor balcony into a bedroom on Felwood Drive. The applicants, Punit and Rosi Daka, sought variances for exceeding the allowed habitable floor area and habitable floor ratio. The proposal called for a modest increase from 3,220 square feet to 3,318 square feet, with a floor ratio increase from 30% to 32.31%. Represented by professional planner Paul J. Fletcher, the applicants emphasized the minimal nature of the variances and the lack of significant impact on the neighborhood. However, the board required justification for deviating from zoning ordinances, highlighting the need for “special reasons” to grant such variances.

35:29The board’s deliberations extended to a project on Falcon Road, which involved adding first and second floors to a residential structure. The applicant sought variances due to existing non-compliance issues, including a side yard setback and aggregate site yard requirement. The proposed design aimed to enhance comfort and functionality without altering the existing footprint. The board expressed support for the application, noting the design and minimal expansion.

1:31:39In another case, an application concerning a property on Hillside Terrace was discussed. The focus was on a variance for the habitable floor area ratio, with the applicant proposing a dwelling that maintained consistency with existing neighborhood setbacks. Concerns were raised about the removal of a tree that could affect drainage, but assurances were given that the township engineer would review drainage plans. The board approved the application with conditions, including compliance with the tree removal ordinance and additional landscaping efforts.