Livingston Zoning Board Faces Variance Requests Amidst Concerns of Neighborhood Impact

The Livingston Town Zoning Board meeting delved into several variance requests, with attention on proposed architectural changes impacting neighborhood dynamics. Among the primary discussions was a proposal for a habitable floor area variance on Winans Road, inciting strong community reactions and a complex deliberation over zoning regulations and neighborhood character.

37:26The debate over the Winans Road property centered on the appropriateness of a proposed house that many in the community, including residents and board members, described as disproportionate to the surrounding homes. The architect’s presentation highlighted a habitable floor area that exceeded the limit for the R4 zone. Community members voiced their concerns, with one resident labeling the proposed structure as a “McMansion,” emphasizing its inconsistency with the neighborhood’s average home size of 1,831 square feet. Concerns about scale, stormwater management, and zoning consistency were prevalent throughout the discussion.

20:32The architect argued for a C2 variance. However, the board maintained a focus on zoning compliance, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to existing regulations. The board highlighted the importance of maintaining neighborhood aesthetics and managing stormwater effectively, given the proposed changes.

A significant portion of the debate revolved around whether the attic space should be considered habitable, with suggestions that its use be limited to avoid further increasing the home’s living area.

1:13:34In another notable variance application, 29 Tower Road LLC sought approval for a new two-story home in an R2 residential zone. The proposed structure required front and rear yard setback variances due to the property’s undersized lot. The architect, John Babula, presented plans for a 3,300-square-foot home, aligning with the neighborhood’s architectural style. The board scrutinized the setback discrepancies and habitable floor area ratio, ultimately approving the proposal with conditions on the attic’s non-habitability.

1:31:26A distinct variance request involved a resident’s wish to convert an attic space into a play area for children at one Rock Hill Drive. The applicant’s argument that the attic served as a substitute for a basement was met with mixed responses. The board approved the request, despite concerns about adding a third level of living space.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: