1:13:52The most debated topic involved a variance request concerning the Northovers’ property. The applicant sought approval for variances related to the left side setback and habitable floor area, prompting extensive discussion about ongoing construction and its impact on neighboring properties. Mr. Burer, a neighboring resident, presented photographs from 2022 to illustrate alleged construction violations and their effects on his property. He expressed frustrations over what he perceived as a “perpetual construction overview,” citing repeated infractions and a lack of adherence to permits and regulations. He urged the board to enforce compliance and establish a clear timeline for project completion, highlighting unauthorized regrading that had led to water flow onto his property, and raised concerns about privacy and safety due to the installation of air conditioning units and surveillance cameras.

In defense, the Northovers’ representatives argued that the construction adhered to zoning and building permits, with adjustments made in compliance with town requirements.

0:00Another application involved Maple Builders LLC, which sought to construct a new single-family residence on Oakwood Avenue. The proposed project required a variance for exceeding the permitted floor area ratio, with the plan presenting a ratio of 33% against the allowed 21%. The presentation included detailed architectural plans for a two-story dwelling and sought to address existing nonconformities while still requiring variance approval. The board engaged with the applicants to clarify compliance with zoning requirements, especially concerning the requested floor area ratio variance.

53:02Further into the meeting, discussions centered around a carport addition at an under-construction residence. The application sought approval for a side yard setback variance due to an oversight in the original permitting process. The applicant’s representative assured that the carport would not impact lot coverage variances and clarified material and design aspects. Public comments from residents, including Carol Berger, raised questions about the project’s ongoing review and compliance with engineering requirements, particularly regarding stormwater management. The board reminded residents that broader concerns should be addressed separately from the current application discussion.

1:31:29In another application, Road Act Builders LLC proposed a new single-family residence, arguing that the current Cape Cod home was in disrepair. The project required a variance for habitable floor area, and the architect presented a design that met side yard setback requirements, intending to improve the neighborhood aesthetics and compliance with township regulations. Concerns were raised by a resident about property line accuracy, prompting a request for a survey to ensure compliance.