The most pressing topic was the ongoing debate about the police department’s management, with differing views on whether the township administrator should have sole authority. Concerns were raised about ensuring proper checks and balances, with one council member emphasizing the importance of preventing excessive power concentration. The council discussed Ordinance 56 3-25, which proposes changes to the oversight structure, eliciting strong reactions from both council members and the public. A resident cited an assessment by Robert J. Ferano, recommending that the township committee delegate policing authority to the township administrator. The resident questioned why the council would consider an ordinance that contradicts this expert advice, highlighting community frustration over perceived inaction on expert recommendations.

Further complicating the issue, the recent departure of the public safety director added to the uncertainty surrounding police department management. Questions were raised about whether the position would be refilled and how shared services with neighboring municipalities might be pursued. A council member underscored the necessity of maintaining a single point of authority for police oversight, while others argued for a committee-led approach to enhance accountability and transparency.

Legal considerations were discussed, including the need for a timeline to reassess governance changes. Some council members suggested delaying decisions until more discussions could occur, while others favored prompt action to resolve the issue.

In addition to the police governance debate, the meeting tackled the establishment of a housing liaison to address state reporting requirements. The council advanced an ordinance to formalize the position, clarifying that the municipal clerk would oversee the role’s responsibilities, including compliance with state mandates. Questions from residents about the liaison’s duties and reporting structure prompted explanations about the position’s focus on the affordable housing trust fund and related reporting obligations.

The council also considered a new ordinance to establish commercial property maintenance standards. A suggestion was made to consult the planning and zoning boards for comprehensive input before proceeding to a public hearing in March.

Public health communications were another significant topic, with discussions on improving the dissemination of health information to residents. Council members explored options to leverage the township’s website and collaborate with neighboring health departments, aiming to create a more efficient system for delivering important health notifications, such as vaccination alerts. The potential formation of an ad hoc committee to connect the Board of Health with social services for seniors was proposed, addressing the identified gap in organized newsletters for senior citizens.

The meeting also featured community engagement activities, including the announcement of a photography contest and awards presentation, summer camp registrations, and an upcoming spring egg hunt with various attractions. The Parks and Recreation department shared plans for summer camps and job opportunities, while the library highlighted its educational programs and events. Concerns about park cleanliness and suggestions for a new LED sign to display township events were also discussed.

Finally, the council addressed carport regulations in residential areas, debating the adequacy of current ordinances and the need for a review. Discussions centered on whether existing regulations sufficiently address issues like temporary structures and impervious coverage, prompting a proposal to involve the planning board and code enforcement officials in reevaluating the ordinances.