The board paid particular attention to the existing ordinance’s rigidity, which has led to numerous variance applications. By distinguishing between properties less than 20,000 square feet and those larger, the proposed changes aim to provide more flexibility. The updates suggest maximum shed sizes of 350 square feet for larger lots and 200 square feet for smaller ones, while also stipulating height restrictions of 15 feet and 12 feet respectively.

A key part of the discussion revolved around pre-existing, non-conforming structures. The board clarified that such structures could only be “grandfathered” if they were legally established prior to the ordinance. Homeowners are responsible for proving any non-conformance. This is intended to prevent unknowingly exceeding allowable coverage limits and future variance needs.

The board’s discussions also brought to light the importance of stormwater runoff management, particularly given Long Hill’s high water table. The ordinance requires that runoff from sheds must be contained within the property, contributing to environmental sustainability and reducing potential disputes between neighbors.

This differentiation aims to regulate simple storage structures versus more elaborate accessory uses.

Following the shed regulation discussion, the board turned its attention to refining prohibited uses within zoning areas. The current ordinance’s complexity, which prohibits all uses not specifically permitted while listing certain prohibited uses, was highlighted as potentially problematic. It was debated whether maintaining a list of prohibited uses alongside a general prohibition was necessary or if it added unnecessary complexity.

The board considered simplifying language to state that all unlisted uses are prohibited, thus eliminating redundancy and reducing potential confusion. This approach aims to streamline decision-making processes and minimize administrative burdens.

The conversation also touched on the township’s stance on cannabis use. Although Long Hill previously opted out of permitting cannabis operations, the board acknowledged the possibility of revisiting this decision. The ordinance’s language could be modified to allow for future adjustments, reflecting changes in state regulations or local sentiment.

The meeting closed with a review of forthcoming applications, including a notable car wash site expected in September.