The primary focus of the meeting was the proposed development on High Street. The applicant, GSD Estates LLC, sought approval for multiple variances to enable the expansion of an existing Cape Cod into a two-story Colonial. The changes required board approval for front yard and side yard setbacks, lot coverage, and detached garage location. Architect Brian Johnson presented the revised plans, which incorporated feedback from the board and local residents. These modifications included a reduction in the height of the house, the reconfiguration of the roof to improve water drainage, and the elimination of dormers to address concerns about the scale and appearance of the development. Additionally, the number of bathrooms was reduced from four to two and a half, and laundry facilities were relocated to the second floor. A deck off the kitchen was added, and adjustments were made to the basement plan.

During the meeting, the board and neighbors discussed the impact of the proposed development on the neighborhood, with particular attention to the size and height of the house. The board scrutinized the revisions to ensure compliance with zoning requirements and consistency with the neighborhood’s character. The board also explored technical details of the development, such as the grading plan and its potential impact on neighboring properties.

Further discussions revolved around the implications of stormwater management for the proposed development and others within the area. The board debated the best practices for managing stormwater and the potential impact of property changes on flooding conditions. Engineers presented opinions on how the proposed developments would affect impervious runoff and how directing water into the municipal system could relieve floodplains naturally. The installation of a fence on one of the properties was a issue, with the board ultimately deciding on a vinyl fence due to maintenance concerns over wood.

The discussion about stormwater management was critical, given the regional focus on reducing impervious coverage and mitigating flooding. The board considered the property’s existing conditions, including a mild slope and drainage patterns, and the proposed changes, like the modification of walkways and the house’s footprint. There was a rigorous exchange on the potential water runoff increase and stormwater remediation, with the board requesting further details on the dates for garage and pool improvements. The deliberation highlighted the significance of absorbing water into the soils and the potential regional impact on water tables.

The board also addressed the property’s development intensity and the potential reduction of impervious coverage. A neighboring property, purchased as part of the Blue Acres program, was discussed in terms of its potential to reduce runoff. The board inquired about observations of water runoff during heavy rainstorms from a resident. The resident noted minimal runoff, attributing this to the sloping land and extensive planting of hedges, trees, and seasonal and perennial plants. The board sought professional opinions on stormwater runoff mitigation options, such as rain gardens, and the impact of existing structures, including a dwelling, garage, and pool, dating back to the 1970s.

The applicant’s attorney argued in favor of the variances. Board members expressed support for the application, recognizing the reduction of nonconformities and the overall neighborhood enhancement. They discussed potential conditions for the resolution, including lot grading limits, soil erosion control, and roof leader measures. The board reached a consensus that the development met the C1 and C2 criteria, aligning with positive criteria without posing significant adverse effects. They acknowledged the property’s size and pre-existing nonconformities but also the potential improvements through the proposed changes. The board voiced support for granting the variances, with members wishing the applicant well in their new home.